Hi,
thanks for your help.
I noticed that the requests of those non-exist domain
name disappeared yesterday. But the NXDOMAIN record in
named.stats keep increasing. ( see attachment)
I'm using BIND9.2.5 BIND9.3.1 on two Solaris box,
each box has two CPUs installed. it's found BIND8.4.6
running
Sorry to attach the rndc stats result.
I run rndc stats continuously( interval is less than
2 seconds), it's shown:
success 17950622
referral 225680
nxrrset 1691861
nxdomain 11203490
recursion 3648017
failure 1363923
...
--- Statistics Dump --- (1116319437)
+++ Statistics
Sorry to attach the rndc stats result.
I run rndc stats continuously( interval is less than
2 seconds), it's shown:
success 17950622
referral 225680
nxrrset 1691861
nxdomain 11203490
recursion 3648017
failure 1363923
...
--- Statistics Dump --- (1116319437)
+++ Statistics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Shen) writes:
I'm using BIND9.2.5 BIND9.3.1 on two Solaris box,
each box has two CPUs installed. it's found BIND8.4.6
running on one CPU could reach the throughput of
BIND9.*.* running on two CPUs.
Could we improve server throughput or lower lower the
effect of
Has anyone had any experience using Network Mitigation devices like the
Cisco Guard XT 5650? I am looking to install one in our network and would
like to know if anyone has used the Cisco device?
thanks
Do you have amny information about last Microsoft problems with security
patches? We can see, how
one of last updates broke MTU discovery (not totally, but it restricts
number of discovered pathes so servers tsop working in a few days). And,
amazingly, no one published this problem.
There is discussion on ntbugtraq
http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.aspx?pid=36sid=1A2=ind0505L=ntbugtraqT=0O=DF=NP=192
---Mike
At 04:43 PM 17/05/2005, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
Do you have amny information about last Microsoft problems with security
patches? We can see, how
one of last updates
Things just seem to coalesce sometimes.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNewsstoryID=8521222
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com
Paul,
I'm sorry if this is JUST to BIND or some other
specific software. But, IMHO this is just a sample
that requests which only generate NXDOMAIN responds.
According to someone's presentation on NANOG (DNS
anomailies and their impact on DNS Cache Server ),
such record may be type of attack.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hello all.
We have a client containing an underscore in the email address domain
name. Our email server rejects it because of it's violation of the RFC
standard. This individuals claim is that he doesn't have problems
anywhere else and if this is going to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hello all.
We have a client containing an underscore in the email address domain
name. Our email server rejects it because of it's violation of the RFC
standard. This individuals claim is that he doesn't have problems
anywhere else and if this is going to
At 8:45 AM +0800 2005-05-18, Joe Shen wrote:
I'm sorry if this is JUST to BIND or some other
specific software. But, IMHO this is just a sample
that requests which only generate NXDOMAIN responds.
Do a DNS query for
One should note that COM and other tld's stopped giving out
domains outside of LDH to prevent these sorts of interoperability
issues. COM actually retrieved the ones they had delegated.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:08:03AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Hello all.
We have a client containing an underscore in the email address domain
name. Our email server rejects it because of it's violation of the RFC
standard. This individuals claim is
on Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:08:03AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
RFC 952 and RFC 1123 describe what is currently legal
in hostnames.
Underscore is NOT a legal character in a hostname.
So, these are *all* non-compliant? Perhaps someone should tell them that.
Certainly would
15 matches
Mail list logo
