Below is a periodic public report from the drone armies / botnets
research and mitigation mailing list.
For this report it should be noted that we base our analysis on the data
we have accumulated from various sources.
According to our incomplete analysis of information we have thus far, we
now
Is anybody seeing any congestion in the Dallas area for Global Crossing?
I'm seeing packet loss to some of my equipment up there.
Thanks,
Joel Perez| Network Engineer
305.914.3412 | Ntera
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:09:26PM -0400, Joel Perez wrote:
Is anybody seeing any congestion in the Dallas area for Global Crossing?
I'm seeing packet loss to some of my equipment up there.
There is a large fiber cut in the area (somewhere between Dallas and
Houston), affecting a lot of
I totally agree with you Richard.
But, in this case all im getting is the run-around from GBLX when
calling them about it. I managed to open up a trouble ticket with them
but their Techs weren't telling me anything other than they will look
into it and call me back.
Even though I am a customer,
Please contact offlist asap.
Thanks,
-Drew
Wasn't there a lot of turmoil within the IETF last year
on sender authentication because Microsoft was trying to
push it's own sender ID authetication mechasnisms as a
draft standard?
Or maybe I'm confused...
Microsoft Adds Sender ID Anti-Spoofing Protocol To Exchange 2003 SP2
DomainKeys are the work of the devil
Well it is one of the most untidy headers
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index:in-reply-to:message-id;
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Wasn't there a lot of turmoil within the IETF last year
on sender authentication because Microsoft was trying to
push it's own sender ID authetication mechasnisms as a
draft standard?
That time it did not work. But they are still trying to
That would be much appreciated. :-)
- ferg
-- william(at)elan.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it appears NANOG continues to be used for mail-related discussions
and a some of what goes here is based on not understanding technologies
and issues involved, I'll make a link to a paper that
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:34:33PM -0400, Joel Perez said something to the
effect of:
I totally agree with you Richard.
So do I, but probably more so with his encouraging your patience than you
appear to.
But, in this case all im getting is the run-around from GBLX when
calling them
Even though it is fed with N+1 UPS power, Qwest put N+1 rectifiers
batteries for their fiber cabinet they installed for me a few years
ago. At the time, batteries were required no matter what, and they
say they will replace them every 5 years. A little-town independent
telco however,
By any chance, are any of you seeing any problems with Qwest frame relay
or iQ in Colorado? We just had a whole bunch of frame relay PVCs all
over the area go down. I've opened a ticket with Qwest, of course, but I
haven't heard back from them since I opened it and I'm now on eternal
hold with
Speaking in my personal, non-list-administrator, not having discussed this
with anybody else, capacity, I think that notifications of large-scale
outages affecting large numbers of networks are a really useful thing to
have on the NANOG list.
Assuming this list has large numbers of people
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:05:58PM -0700, Steve Gibbard wrote:
Speaking in my personal, non-list-administrator, not having discussed this
with anybody else, capacity, I think that notifications of large-scale
outages affecting large numbers of networks are a really useful thing to
have
At 06:12 PM 6/7/2005, you wrote:
If we started posting about every fiber cut of every carrier anywhere in
North America every time it happened there wouldn't be any room left on
this list for talking about spam, senderid, DNS RFCs, E911 for VoIP
carriers, err... wait which side am I arguing
I concur.
- ferg
-- Dave Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I think NANOG is certainly an appropriate forum for medium/large-scale
outages - unless someone's created an outage list someplace.
I will agree that it's not the place to bitch about a vendor not giving
more specifics, dumping
Agreed. I joined Nanog initially to be alerted of medium/large-scale outages
(used to work for a telco), but then I was pleasantly surprised by the deeper
technical edge of most participants on this fabulous list. Best of both
worlds, IMO. Thanks and regards to all,
pj
-Original
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Matt Mills wrote:
Why we don't use Bittorrent for the distribution of the satellite data:
This is just where P2P and satellite data don't mesh. In order for the
program to work and not be incredibly frustrating and boring, the tiles
(imagery and elevation) have to be
--On June 5, 2005 8:11:41 PM -0700 Jay Hennigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The corollary to this question:
If your data center has an adequate DC plant, will the carriers insist
on installing their own batteries and rectifiers? And how many of them
have redundant supplies to take advantage
Yes, there was lots of teeth gnashing and screams of agony allegedly because
MS refused to license the technology on the terms that folks wanted. MS was
more than willing to let folks have it at no cost, they just weren't willing
to give the naysayer everything they wanted, so everyone went home.
On 06/07/05, John Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shameless plug: over in the anti-spam research group at asrg.sp.am I
sure would like it if people were working on reputation systems to
plug the gaping hole left by all these authentication schemes.
Not sure if it's a gaping hole, so
21 matches
Mail list logo
