Drew Weaver wrote:
Howdy, I am not sure if this is the proper place, if not
I've noticed you guys know what to do so I'll put the fire retardant
suit on now. Recently due to growth we have seen an influx of
different and interesting types of characters ending up on our
network.
I'm hoping here that this post isn't out of line with the scope of the
NANOG list, of which I've been a long time lurker. If so, please just
ignore me.
We're trying to calculate Jitter of a variable (non-limited) size data
set. One Jitter formula that we see cited occasionally (and is in
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 23:29 +0300, Kim Onnel wrote:
How about project Darknet and sinkholes and monitoring dark ip space,
worms and botnets usually scans blindly right and left, so there is a
good chance you will get a glimpse on infected hosts if thats what you
want, i catch infected hosts by
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:53:09 -0600
Jeff Murri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping here that this post isn't out of line with the scope of the
NANOG list, of which I've been a long time lurker. If so, please just
ignore me.
Hello Jeff;
These are both moving averages, the question is
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:40:55 PDT, Matt Ghali said:
So you see, the reputation has nothing to do with your mom, and
everything to do with the controlling entity, her ISP. Which makes
the whole address-based sender reputation scheme almost workable, if
you ignore the scaling issues.
That's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:40:55 PDT, Matt Ghali said:
So you see, the reputation has nothing to do with your mom, and
everything to do with the controlling entity, her ISP. Which makes
the whole address-based sender reputation scheme almost workable, if
you ignore the
On 10/06/05, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone in the SPAMwar has to be aware that SPAM can't be stopped until
its transaction costs approach that of the cheapest other advertising
method. That can be snailmail spam, telephone terror^Wmarketing, whatever,
you name it.
The
you saw marshall's comment. If you're interested in a moving average,
he's pretty close.
If I understood your question, though, you simply wanted to quantify
the jitter in a set of samples. I should think there are two obvious
definitions there.
A statistician would look, I should think,
At 09:56 AM 6/10/2005, Fred Baker wrote:
you saw marshall's comment. If you're interested in a moving average, he's
pretty close.
If I understood your question, though, you simply wanted to quantify the
jitter in a set of samples. I should think there are two obvious
definitions there.
A
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:40:55 PDT, Matt Ghali said:
So you see, the reputation has nothing to do with your mom, and
everything to do with the controlling entity, her ISP. Which makes
the whole address-based sender reputation scheme
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 11 Jun, 2005
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:07:06 -0700
Eric Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:56 AM 6/10/2005, Fred Baker wrote:
you saw marshall's comment. If you're interested in a moving average, he's
pretty close.
If I understood your question, though, you simply wanted to quantify the
jitter
Hello, Motorola employees:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNewsstoryID=8759801
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
13 matches
Mail list logo
