Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]

2005-06-19 Thread Jon Lewis
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Todd Vierling wrote: > There are far too many SMTP machines already deployed out there -- we're not > talking thousands; here it's tens to hundreds of thousands worldwide -- to It's actually millions. And I'm not just pulling that number out of someone's -

Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]

2005-06-19 Thread Todd Vierling
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The thousands of bilateral BGP peering contracts are most > > > definitely comparable to the email peering that I am > > > proposing. > > > > Dude, it's 2005. You can put down the X.400 crack pipe now. > > Why does fixing the SMTP email archite

More long AS-sets announced

2005-06-19 Thread Lorenzo Colitti
Lorenzo Colitti wrote: as part of our AS-set stuffing experiments (announced, including links to in-depth information, in [1]), we will be announcing unusually large AS-sets tomorrow, Thursday 16 June. Hi, due to unforeseen technical difficulties, we have been forced to postpone these exper

Re: Email peering

2005-06-19 Thread Alexei Roudnev
My e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I send it when I am on DSL with EthLink (and thru Earthlink SMTP). And it is 100% valid situation. - Original Message - From: "John Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 12:25 AM Subj