[ apologies for the wide distribution ]
Dear reader,
On november the 1st 2005, the rbl.cluecentral.net ip-to-country and
ip-to-as DNS list will cease to exist. All queries will fail and on
december the 1st 2005 I will remove the dns-servers from the machines
they are running on.
Important note:
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 16:40 -0700, Braun, Mike wrote:
>
> Apologies for straying off topic,
>
> Years ago several tools and sites were available for troubleshooting BGP
> routing tables and viewing reachability over the Internet. I remember using
> a site that, when you provided an ASN or IP add
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 28 21:45:57 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:36:22 +0530
> From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Curtis Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: fleet.navy.mil DNS / network ops contact please
> Cc: NANOG
>
>
> On 27/10/05, Curtis Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The information you seek
I've found from experience that connectivity to various .mil sites
varies on a moment to moment basis based on your source address and the
mood of the day. That being said, the best luck I've had getting issues
resolved is by contacting DISA, by phone, and opening a case -
http://www.disa.mil/main
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 29 Oct, 2005
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051028/laf022.html?.v=27
The internet will not end on November(9)th :)
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Now, one really needs to wonder why the agreement could not be reached
*prior* to the depeering on 10/5
It's not rocket science.
It's only as complex as one makes it out to be. (one can attempt to explain
away the complexities, but they apparently were able to *finalize* an
agreement in 3 weeks
ASN - Migration
What are the real gotchas for changing ASNs that people have run
into? There is a minor one in terms of route-registry timeliness, I can't
update RADB until the change takes place and ISPs don't run their update
scripts on my timetable. So I see there might be a gap. If so
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Flint Barber wrote:
What are the real gotchas for changing ASNs that people have run
into? There is a minor one in terms of route-registry timeliness, I can't
update RADB until the change takes place and ISPs don't run their update
scripts on my timetable. So I see
>On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Flint Barber wrote:
>> What are the real gotchas for changing ASNs that people have run
>> into? There is a minor one in terms of route-registry timeliness, I
>> can't update RADB until the change takes place and ISPs don't run
>> their update scripts on my timetable
As for the providers who generate filters based off of IRR data, some
of those may have mechanisms to do some sort of a manual filter push to
accommodate >your needs.
Anyone have a list of providers that actively use IRR data for route
control other than for direct peering session control??
> This is the plan. But this is more verification and repair than
> proactively mitigating. I imagine it will be a long day Sunday anyway.
In the verification and repair line, iNOC-DBA seems a good tool to have.
You could proactively verify your IP Phone is working... :-)
Rubens
"...the companies have agreed to the settlement-free exchange of
traffic subject to specific payments if certain obligations are not
met."
So it does look like Cogent bent somwhat...I'm guessing they agreed
to pay some sort of "traffic imbalance fee"? Anyone know of any other
peering ar
Christopher Woodfield wrote:
"...the companies have agreed to the settlement-free exchange of
traffic subject to specific payments if certain obligations are not met."
So it does look like Cogent bent somwhat...I'm guessing they agreed to
pay some sort of "traffic imbalance fee"?
Ther
Hello,
I am currently looking for ASN databases from LACNIC and AFRINIC
the same way they are provided at
ftp://ftp.arin.net/pub/rr/arin.db
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/dbase/ripe.db.gz
ftp://ftp.apnic.net/apnic/whois-data/APNIC/apnic.RPSL.db.gz
I've traversed their respective ftp.[lacnic|afrinic].n
Eric Louie wrote:
Now, one really needs to wonder why the agreement could not be reached
*prior* to the depeering on 10/5
It's not rocket science.
As people have pointed out repeatedly, this was surely not rocket science
since it wasn't a technical problem at all. It was a business conflict.
Are there any AOL Postmasters on the list?
I'm having an issue that the toll-free regular AOL
Postmaster helpdesk telling me will take 3-5
business days to resolve, and it's more urgent
then that.
Thank you
David
ftp://ftp.lacnic.net/pub/stats/lacnic/delegated-lacnic-latest has IP
space and ASN allocations. ASN lines look like this:
lacnic|MX|asn|278|1|19890331|allocated
lacnic|AR|asn|676|1|19900523|allocated
lacnic|BR|asn|1251|1|19910405|allocated
lacnic|MX|asn|1292|1|19910524|allocated
They mirror simi
On 29/10/05, David Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are there any AOL Postmasters on the list?
> I'm having an issue that the toll-free regular AOL
> Postmaster helpdesk telling me will take 3-5
> business days to resolve, and it's more urgent
> then that.
>
That takes you directly to AOL's
On 10/28/05 5:45 PM, "JC Dill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Christopher Woodfield wrote:
>>
>> "...the companies have agreed to the settlement-free exchange of
>> traffic subject to specific payments if certain obligations are not met."
>>
>> So it does look like Cogent bent somwhat...I'm
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 01:30:23AM -0200, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
> ftp://ftp.lacnic.net/pub/stats/lacnic/delegated-lacnic-latest has IP
> space and ASN allocations. ASN lines look like this:
>
> lacnic|MX|asn|278|1|19890331|allocated
...
I found that one, but this is less helpful for what I
On 10/28/05 7:37 PM, "Crist Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eric Louie wrote:
>> Now, one really needs to wonder why the agreement could not be reached
>> *prior* to the depeering on 10/5
>>
>> It's not rocket science.
>
> As people have pointed out repeatedly, this was surely not rocket
You could take every asn out of the delegated list, and query
whois.lacnic.net for each one... just rate-limit the queries (1/min is
ok, I think) and after a few hours you'll have pairs like this:
aut-num: AS1251
owner: Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Pau
But I guess tha
24 matches
Mail list logo
