Re: classful routes redux

2005-11-05 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:14:31PM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote: On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Fred Baker wrote: While I think /32, /48, /56, and /64 are reasonable prefix lengths for what they are proposed for, I have this feeling of early fossilization when it doesn't

Re: classful routes redux

2005-11-05 Thread Geoff Huston
Also, some of the original motivations behind CIDR starts to go out the window when you have enough IP space that you can hand out huge chunks ahead of immediate need. Who cares about efficient utilization or but I only need a /35 and you gave me a whole /32, I'm wasting so much space when

Re: classful routes redux

2005-11-05 Thread Geoff Huston
At 03:09 AM 5/11/2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Russ White wrote: - -- BGP is currently moving to a 2^32 space for AS numbers. That's odd, if there's only 18,044 origins in the current table, and it won't ever grow to much more--how'd we lose 40,000 or so AS

Re: oh k can you see

2005-11-05 Thread Chris Woodfield
Maybe I'm missing something, but the core issue is that the NO- EXPORT'ed anycast instance has a higher localpref inside the AS it's being advertised to, and as such supressing the non-NO_EXPORT'ed prefix. The exportable prefix gets suppressed at a point on the network such that the

Re: classful routes redux

2005-11-05 Thread Marshall Eubanks
Hello; On Nov 5, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: At 03:09 AM 5/11/2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Russ White wrote: - -- BGP is currently moving to a 2^32 space for AS numbers. That's odd, if there's only 18,044 origins in the current table, and it

Re: oh k can you see

2005-11-05 Thread Randy Bush
Maybe I'm missing something, but the core issue is that the NO- EXPORT'ed anycast instance has a higher localpref inside the AS it's being advertised to, and as such supressing the non-NO_EXPORT'ed prefix. The exportable prefix gets suppressed at a point on the network such that the

Domino and Message-ID's

2005-11-05 Thread David Lesher
I've figured out that a friend's Domino Notes server is [being generous..] saving energy by skimping on bits; the Message-ID headers are as you see below. |X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 |Date: 03-Nov-2005 09:12:57 EST |Message-ID: |X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on