you may remember that steve gibbard asked to step down from the
nanog mailing list admin panel. two weeks ago, the steering
committee, with the ml panel, issued a call for volunteers to
replace steve. the deadline was today.
there were four volunteers, all of whom deserve our thanks for
offerin
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Other than references to spam and a couple other minor things, there's a
> remarkable lack of discussion of content, either good or bad, in this draft.
> If anything, this appears to be the exact opposite of what SBC et al want.
> Given all the fuss abo
> So... Microsoft has a monopoly on Windows and the basic OS costs
> you $299 with virtually no server capabilities.
>
> In the POSIX-style OS world, where you have multiple competitors,
> prices range from $0 to $179.
Either these products are comparable or they are not. If they are
com
Thus spake "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Blaine Christian wrote:
Since port 80 and port 25 are lawful services everyone offering
broadband will have to drop filters and provide full routing! Can
you hear me now? Why yes, port 80 and port 25 are open, of cour
Does anyone know if there is anything left of Network Access
Solutions (NASC.OB)?
I know DSL.NET bought their DSL customer base, but are they
still around doing something else?
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
You know, if people are going to post here as a paging service, it would
be nice to put some indication as to why - perhaps the rest of us can
assist more quickly? 9 times out of 10 we can since it's usually
operator/user error and not necessarily the providers issue. At
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:44:10 +0100
Daniel Karrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15.11 07:38, Mark Smith wrote:
> >
> > RFC1627, "Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be
> > Codified)" and RFC3879, "Deprecating Site Local Addresses" provide some
> > good examples of where
At 05:57 AM 18/11/2005, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> Normally I'm rather loathe to send urls around - but in this case you
> may find this APNIC work directly relevant to what you are asking for:
>
>
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-51/presentations/pdf/ripe51-address-cert
Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> Normally I'm rather loathe to send urls around - but in this case you
> may find this APNIC work directly relevant to what you are asking for:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-51/presentations/pdf/ripe51-address-certificate.pdf
It's really good to see this takin
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:25 PM, Jeff Rosowski wrote:
Oh, the irony - all I get is:
Linux Journal Is Currently Unavailable Due to a Denial of Service
(DoS) Attack
Sorry for any inconvenience.
I suppose the bells and the cable providers are DOS'ing them .
BTW, it is STILL not clear to me
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > That's intriguing ...
>
> Translation: "Linux Journal has been linked to by Slashdot."
It took forever for me to pull up the article in Mozilla, but it came up
fine otherwise. I'm sure they did get slashdotted.
--
Steve Sobol, Professiona
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > > The cable industry claims 91% of households passed with two-way cable.
> >
> > And zero in my area. And you can't start a telco COOP in this
> > state since the iLEC has encour
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > The cable industry claims 91% of households passed with two-way cable.
>
> And zero in my area. And you can't start a telco COOP in this
> state since the iLEC has encouraged laws to make that not legal. The
> two major iLECs in this state (Ve
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Edward W. Ray wrote:
My cogent traffic is getting routed to my other peers here in Orange County,
CA and I cannot access http://www.cogentco.com either.
I have routes for it (38.0.0.0/8 from all my transits), but I can't
reach www.cogentco.com either. Traces to it die
Normally I'm rather loathe to send urls around - but in this case you may
find this APNIC work directly relevant to what you are asking for:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-51/presentations/pdf/ripe51-address-certificate.pdf
I also did some work a year or so back on the differences bet
My cogent traffic is getting routed to my other peers here in Orange County,
CA and I cannot access http://www.cogentco.com either.
Edward W. Ray
CISSP, MCSE 2003+Security, P.E., SANS GCIA Gold, SANS GCIH Gold
President
NetSec Design & Consulting
http://www.netsecdesign.com
(714) 997-9226
fyi i can NOT get to http://status.cogentco.com thru xo and savvis in
chicago
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Lyons, Myke
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:33 AM
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: [NANOG]Cogent issues
>
>
>
>
>
>
At 13:59 -0800 11/11/05, Tony Tauber wrote:
There are some resources, like IP addresses and AS numbers, the proper
operation of which hinges on their uniqueness.
...
Does this concern make sense?
Does this course of action make sense?
Is there a(nother) better venue than the IAB?
What do pe
Oh, the irony - all I get is:
Linux Journal Is Currently Unavailable Due to a Denial of Service (DoS)
Attack
Sorry for any inconvenience.
On 15.11 07:38, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> RFC1627, "Network 10 Considered Harmful (Some Practices Shouldn't be
> Codified)" and RFC3879, "Deprecating Site Local Addresses" provide some
> good examples of where duplicate or overlapping address spaces cause
> problems, which is what happens when differ
.myke lyons
> -Original Message-
> From: David J. Coulson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 November 2005 15:54
> To: M. Aelmans | Synssans B.V.
> Cc: Lyons, Myke; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues
>
> M. Aelmans | Synssans B.V. wrote:
> > I see very high latency t
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, David Barak wrote:
I think you mean http://www.cogentco.com
It's up.
Their wholesale dialup product appears to be down. A coworker just called
it in and was told "multiple fiber cuts" have seriously impacted Cogent's
network.
Multiple simultaneous fiber cuts...yeah,
On 17-Nov-2005, at 10:59, Brian Kerr wrote:
On 11/17/05, Eric Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to make analysis easier: Which prefixes should be missing?
There seem to be larger problems,
http://www.cogent.com returns:
That does seem to be a problem for cogent.com. To complete y
I'm going to try this again. It seems like my messages are not going
through.
Regards,
Ryan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:04:29 -0500 (EST)
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Cogent Issues... (Update)
Cogent is experiencing 2 fiber cuts in the north/southeas
On 11/17/05, Brian Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seem to be larger problems,
>
> http://www.cogent.com returns:
>
> Error 404 Not found
Pay no attention, I apparently don't know what I'm doing.
The URL
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8673
now leads to the following message:
"Linux Journal Is Currently Unavailable Due to a Denial of Service (DoS)
Attack Sorry for any inconvenience."
That's intriguing ...
Most likely incorrect too. They've been /.'d...not just nanog'd. They
--- Brian Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/17/05, Eric Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Heya,
> >
> > > Just to make analysis easier: Which prefixes
> should be missing?
>
> There seem to be larger problems,
>
> http://www.cogent.com returns:
>
> Error 404 Not found
I t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Brian Kerr
> Sent: 17 November 2005 16:00
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: [NANOG]Cogent issues
>
>
> On 11/17/05, Eric Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Heya,
> >
> > > Just to make ana
Cogent is experiencing 2 fiber cuts in the north/southeast-US. The
locations are:
Between Houston and Tampa (Southeast) Ticket #347277
Between Philidelpha and DC (Northeast) Ticket #347375
Customers traversing cogent's network will experience latency and packet
loss. You can check the sta
On 16.11 21:33, Bubba Parker wrote:
>
> Seems to be back up now.
At this time I got
"Linux Journal Is Currently Unavailable Due to a Denial of Service (DoS) Attack
Sorry for any inconvenience."
Interesting. At first sight I though that was why Randy
posted the URL under "future of the net" ;-
> The URL
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8673
>
> now leads to the following message:
>
> "Linux Journal Is Currently Unavailable Due to a Denial of
> Service (DoS) Attack Sorry for any inconvenience."
>
> That's intriguing ...
Translation: "Linux Journal has been linked to by Slash
Anyone else find it funny that of all the Cogent
peering on that chart, only the Cogent to Level 3
link shows green? :-)
David
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ryan A. Krenzischek
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:49 AM
> To:
On 11/17/05, Eric Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
> > Just to make analysis easier: Which prefixes should be missing?
There seem to be larger problems,
http://www.cogent.com returns:
Error 404 Not found
The host name in the URL you have requested "www.cogent.com" does not
match
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Bubba Parker wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:33:17 -0600
> From: Bubba Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Gordon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: the future of the net
>
>
> Seems to be
Heya,
> Just to make analysis easier: Which prefixes should be missing?
We've got a feed from Cogent out of Boston and we did see a 5 minute
drop by about 5k routes in their annoucements. After that, we look as
though we're only short by around 400 or so prefixes:
11/17/2005 9:30172,
Take a look at this:
http://scoreboard.keynote.com/scoreboard/Main.aspx?Login=Y&Username=public&Password=public
I just got off the phone with Cogent. They said there was a fiber cut in the
eastern-US. The representative did not have specific details. They said
either in the NY or DC area.
Lyons, Myke wrote:
For the past hour or so a number of sites that I have with Cogent have
been unreachable. Also, I am unable to get through to their support
line. Is anyone else seeing this?
.myke lyons
I see very high latency to Cogent London.
Regards,
Melchior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lyons, Myke) wrote:
> For the past hour or so a number of sites that I have with Cogent have
> been unreachable. Also, I am unable to get through to their support
> line. Is anyone else seeing this?
Just to make analysis easier: Which prefixes should be missing?
Elmar.
--
They've got something going on, we've got about a
25% drop in our outbound Cogent traffic at about
9:45 AM EST.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Lyons, Myke
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:31 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
>
Title: [NANOG]Cogent issues
For the past hour or so a number of sites that I have with Cogent have been unreachable. Also, I am unable to get through to their support line. Is anyone else seeing this?
.myke lyons
Thought provoking article and the consumer side of the 'net is already
heading there i.e. no VPN on many 'broadband' lines unless you pay for
'business' CoS (which I do). Does anyone here remember the Dow Jones
Information service in which you are billed by the minute AND the service
you access
Windows 98 price (in 1997) -> $209
Office 97 Standard (in 1997) -> $689
Windows XP price (now) -> $199.
Office 2003 (now) -> $399.
Verizon Retail 768k DSL, $14.95/month (includes everything)
Verizon Wholesale 768k DSL, $13.95/month + DS3 ATM + IP + support + e-
mail
Verizon CLEC 2W DSL Con
Hello,
IIJ/AS2497 still sees problems with source address, 125.30.0.0/16.
It seems that many ASs and servers are blocking packets from
125.30.0.0/16. We hope you would check your filters again.
Two points:
1) route filter (prefix based filters)
2) packet filter (ACLs on interface)<- do no
43 matches
Mail list logo
