Re: a record?

2005-11-19 Thread Sean Donelan
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Alexei Roudnev wrote: > Security by obscurity eliminates all (100%) of this automated scans and > automated attacks. So, having SSH on port 63023 (for example) and seen > probes, you can be 100% sure that someone have SPECIFIC interest in your This is just security by outrun

Re: a record?

2005-11-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 11/20/05, Alexei Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, this is only SIGN. Add good fence, rifle etc (castle, water > channel, draw bridge, knights -:)) if you have something which bad guys are > interested in. But post NO TRESPASSIGN first of all. When you put it that way, fair enoug

Re: a record?

2005-11-19 Thread Alexei Roudnev
Security by obscurity eliminates all (100%) of this automated scans and automated attacks. So, having SSH on port 63023 (for example) and seen probes, you can be 100% sure that someone have SPECIFIC interest in your site, and so you can spend time and investigate, what he is looking for (by, for

Re: AOL Postmaster contact?

2005-11-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Oh - I forgot the other advantage of doing this. When you aggregate all .forward email out through a single box, stuff that's slipping through your filters starts to stick out like a sore thumb when you analyze the mail queues on that box, so you can tune your inbound filters better. Quite a use

Re: AOL Postmaster contact?

2005-11-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 11/20/05, Mark Costlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Someone might look at the ticket Monday. Meanwhile, I've got thousands of > queued messages frrom users that are upset with ME because I can't get > their mail to AOL. > AOL's whitelist + feedback loop is not really a whitelist If the num

Re: a record?

2005-11-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 11/20/05, Alexei Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other approach exists as well - SecureID on firewall. Login to firewall, > authenticate, and have dynamic access list which opens ssh for you (and > still keep ssh on port != 22). Or VPN in, or set up a tunnel of some sort. Have ssh availa

Re: a record?

2005-11-19 Thread Austin McKinley
Or OpenBSD with pf and authpf: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/authpf.html Austin Alexei Roudnev wrote: I said many times - just use non standard port. Number of hackerts who discover this port wil decrease approx 10,000 times, to almost 0 (number). (Of course, except if you are a bank). Oth

Re: a record?

2005-11-19 Thread Alexei Roudnev
I said many times - just use non standard port. Number of hackerts who discover this port wil decrease approx 10,000 times, to almost 0 (number). (Of course, except if you are a bank). Other approach exists as well - SecureID on firewall. Login to firewall, authenticate, and have dynamic access