Thanks to everyone that replied to my message. I'll contact the NOC
directly.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Joseph W. Breu wrote:
Can someone from Sprint NOC contact me offlist regarding a routing issue?
--
Thanks,
-
Joseph W. Breu, CCN
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Joseph W. Breu wrote:
>
> Can someone from Sprint NOC contact me offlist regarding a routing issue?
>
one presumes you already tried:
http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.cgi?ispname=sprint
and I'm guessing you have a customer contact number since you appear to be
a sprint c
Can someone from Sprint NOC contact me offlist regarding a routing issue?
--
Thanks,
-
Joseph W. Breu, CCNA phone : +1.319.268.5228
Senior Network Administratorfax : +1.319.266.8158
Cedar Falls Utilities
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:05:16PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> here's the real challenge. i would like to chat to a couple of
> dead nanog users.
>
> randy
punctuation is all...
dead nanog, users
dead, nanog users
--bill
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Elijah Savage writes:
>
>Can anyone confirm this I got this from a security partner of ours.
>
>The source code for the Sober.Z worm, which began infecting computers
>worldwide on Nov. 21, indicates that the author(s) are planning to
>launch another attack on Thu
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Fergie wrote:
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/archive-122005.html#0729
- ferg
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/archive-122005.html#0743
whois www-f-secure.com
nice.
-Dan
Fergie wrote:
See:
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/archive-122005.html#0729
- ferg
-- Elijah Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone confirm this I got this from a security partner of ours.
The source code for the Sober.Z worm, which began infecting computers
worldwide o
See:
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/archive-122005.html#0729
- ferg
-- Elijah Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone confirm this I got this from a security partner of ours.
The source code for the Sober.Z worm, which began infecting computers
worldwide on Nov. 21, indi
Can anyone confirm this I got this from a security partner of ours.
The source code for the Sober.Z worm, which began infecting computers
worldwide on Nov. 21, indicates that the author(s) are planning to
launch another attack on Thursday, Jan. 5 and Friday 6, to coincide with
the 87th anniv
All,
I wanted to drop a quick note to let people know about the
availability of additional BGP-Inspect sites based on data other than
the routeviews data which we have been supporting till now. This
should provide much better visibility than before.
The new sites are:
- BGP-Inspect-RIPE(http:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:05:16PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> here's the real challenge. i would like to chat to a couple of
> dead nanog users.
>
> randy
Unless you have a prayer, you haven't got a prayer.
--
Joe Yao
---
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Alexander Koch wrote:
> I was wondering if someone had done any or some research on this before...
> basically I am not sure with all the many implementations of BGP and all the
> vendors if and what those will do when they see a metric of 0 and no metric. I
> am not an expert
On Jan 3, 2006, at 1:03 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
So the spec is fuzzy about how "no MED vs. MED=0" should be
treated, but
vendors seem to largely agree to "no MED == MED 0". I know of no
deviation, except the old ERX bug which got fixed (ERX treated "no
MED"
as best, even better than MED
:-> "Alexander" == Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hiya,
> I was wondering if someone had done any or some research on
> this before... basically I am not sure with all the many
> implementations of BGP and all the vendors if and what those
> will do when they se
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:21:43AM +0100, Alexander Koch wrote:
> I was wondering if someone had done any or some research on
> this before...
Yup, when troubleshooting the ERXes former wrong handling of
"no MED". :-)
> basically I am not sure with all the many
> implementations of BGP and all t
15 matches
Mail list logo
