Re: workhorse of the future...

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:39:59PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > first it was the vitalinks, then the bridge gear, then proteon, then cisco > AGS, > then 7600VXR, then 7301s > > looking to find the next-gen workhorse ... looking for 4-6yr life expectancy. > pointers(private are ok) ar

RE: workhorse of the future...

We are working Juniper to build the next gen version, hopefully they listen. -Dee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: workhorse of the future

workhorse of the future...

first it was the vitalinks, then the bridge gear, then proteon, then cisco AGS, then 7600VXR, then 7301s looking to find the next-gen workhorse ... looking for 4-6yr life expectancy. pointers(private are ok) are appreciated - as well as -why- you think the suggested boxen are likely candidat

Re: Reporting botnets?

> Please advise, where to can I report botnet control activities? > I'm from overseas and interested if there are some law enforcement > organizations in US who may handle these issues? > > I assume it is illegal business in US, and I have enough evidence > how botnet control sites command our t

Reporting botnets?

Hello colleagues, Please advise, where to can I report botnet control activities? I'm from overseas and interested if there are some law enforcement organizations in US who may handle these issues? I assume it is illegal business in US, and I have enough evidence how botnet control sites comma

Virus: Remarks about Virus Volume reduction since mid-decemeber 2006

Hi, We had a constant volume of virus trapped by clamav, mcafee, etc. of about 2% of all mail traffics coming from outside our network. Since mid-december the volume is now under 0.2% while the mail traffic stay in line with the tendencies of the previous year. I'm not looking

routeviews outage

Folks, We've had a UPS failure in the colo space where much of the routeviews gear is housed. We're working on bringing it all back up, but I suspect its going to be a few minutes (like 30-45). Thanks, and sorry for any inconvenience. Dave

Re: SAVVIS and Global Crossing Loss on West Coast

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Flint Barber wrote: Has anyone seen heard about network loss on the west coast for SAVVIS and Global Crossing?? -Flint uhh.. no

Re: SAVVIS and Global Crossing Loss on West Coast

Um...I've heard that the latter *hasn't* suffered a loss... Sorry. --ra On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:29:40AM -0700, Flint Barber said something to the effect of: > > Has anyone seen heard about network loss on the west coast for SAVVIS > and Global Crossing?? > -Flint > -- rachael treu gomes

SAVVIS and Global Crossing Loss on West Coast

Has anyone seen heard about network loss on the west coast for SAVVIS and Global Crossing?? -Flint

Re: QWest is having some pretty nice DNS issues right now

On Monday 09 Jan 2006 15:46, you wrote: > What do you mean by "the authoritative name servers on different logical > networks." Whatever the logical division of IP routing is. On the internet this is usually AS number, but the network engineers might know of linkages between different network

Re: QWest is having some pretty nice DNS issues right now

On Monday 09 Jan 2006 21:26, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Randy Bush wrote: > > > It seems like maybe that is all too common. Are the 'best practices' > > > documented for Authoritative DNS somewhere central? > > > > 2182 > > yes, yes.. people who care (a lot) have read this