On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:11:32AM +1000,
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:
> Fairly well -- a lot better than (eg) vservers, and almost certainly
> better than UMLs.
Because they are different virtualisation solutions with different
requirments. If yo
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:54 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
- Original Message - From: "neal rauhauser"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NANGO"
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 8:17 AM
Subject: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00)
Got this forwarded to me by an associate - seem
Anyone here from chase.com?
http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=chaseonline.chase.com
If so please pass that on to your dns folks. It's causing problems for
people who have dns anti cache poisoning enabled.
George Roettger
Netlink
Title: Savvis issues in Weehawken?
Does anyone know what's up with Savvis in Weehawken? We've seen issues since before 8AM EST. They're not saying much at this point.
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be legally privileged and con
Did anyone else notice the withdrawal of 205.178.184.0/21? I
couldn't reach Network Solutions or any worldnic.com DNS servers for
at least 10 minutes from our network or any route server I tried on
the Internet. All were on this /21 which was no longer being
announced from any perspective I
I _did_ happen to notice that sub-delegation WHOIS lookups via
completewhois.com and geektools.com both indicate problems at
Network Solutuions this morning
- ferg
-- Vinny Abello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did anyone else notice the withdrawal of 205.178.184.0/21? I
couldn't reac
We saw it as well this morning, several of our accounts
host DNS through worldnic, and they were down. Appears
up now though.
--tlf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Vinny Abello
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:13 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
We saw repeated withdrawals of 205.178.184.0/21, and it lasted well over
an hour..
#show ip bgp 205.178.190.1
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/0
5 minutes later:
#show ip bgp 205.178.190.1
BGP routing table entry for 205.178.184.0/21
We were seeing the prefix re-appear for one provid
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:
> Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently. From my point of
> view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find
> that's even remotely related.
Given the fact that the type of places that the PIRT people need to not
We have been unable to resolve speakeasy.net. Both authoritative
nameservers are unresponsive (ns.nyc1.speakeasy.net and
ns-sea.speakeasy.net). Anyone else seeing any issues?
Fox,Thomas wrote:
We saw it as well this morning, several of our accounts
host DNS through worldnic, and they were d
Anyone have any insight? I'm seeing Netsol brokeness, plus apparent
issues between At&t and Qwest in at least one point.
Surprised the list isn't more active.
Jason
--
Jason Slagle
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
X
Is anyone having any difficulties with connectivity between ATT ENS and
Qwest?
Anyone seeing Qwest issues in the Western US?
>>> Janet Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/4/06 9:09:24 AM >>>
>
>Anyone seeing Qwest issues in the Western US?
What sort of issues are you seeing? I've got a site in CA that's using
Qwest's iQ VPN and it's been intermittently unreachable all morning.
During the short periods I can actually access
Qwest connetivity from Salt Lake to ATT ENS in the bay area is stopping
at at core SLC qwest router in traceroutes.
Qwest's network status page also shows 5% packet loss for the SLC
region at the moment (which means what -- one link test from elsewhere
is down 100% and 19 are up?).
John Neibe
Janet Sullivan wrote:
Anyone seeing Qwest issues in the Western US?
Yes. We're not homed to them but are having issues reaching Qwest-homed
sites in Chicago from California. We are multi-homed AS1, 701, 7018
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetLoj
Here is the scoop.
Dear Valued Partner,
This morning our collocation provider suffered a global outage from 7:56
a.m. to 10:02 a.m. (eastern) that impacted the Network Solutions systems.
The providers outage affected access to Network Solutions products and
services. The provider has resolv
I have a Qwest DS3 that I monitor through an InterNAP link, both in
Northern California, no alerts here!
-Wil
Janet Sullivan wrote:
Anyone seeing Qwest issues in the Western US?
Here is the scoop.
Dear Valued Partner,
This morning our collocation provider suffered a global outage from 7:56
a.m. to 10:02 a.m. (eastern) that impacted the Network Solutions systems.
The providers outage affected access to Network Solutions products and
services. The provider has resol
On 4/4/06, Vinny Abello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Did anyone else notice the withdrawal of 205.178.184.0/21? I
> couldn't reach Network Solutions or any worldnic.com DNS servers for
> at least 10 minutes from our network or any route server I tried on
> the Internet. All were on this /
On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:
Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently. From my point of
view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find
that's even remotely related.
Given the fact that
At 03:04 PM 4/4/2006, n3td3v wrote:
[ CLIP ]
Hi,
"Meanwhile, in the second attack of its kind in the past few days, DNS
servers at Network Solutions were hit by a denial-of-service attack,
resulting in a brief performance degradation for customers, according
to the company."
The above repo
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:51:46 EDT, John Payne said:
> I'm talking about ME receiving a complaint from them about a Yahoo!
> issue... that's how bad it is.
> (No, I don't work for Yahoo!, my employer does have a relationship
> with them, but we don't provide them IP connectivity).
Would this be
Hi,
Is there any application that uses RFC 3107 (Label info inside BGP)
encoding other than RFC 2547?
I mean, is there any application that advertises BGP labels along with
the NLRIs? Is anybody using this?
Thanks!
Kent
Hi, folks,
I run a small colocation cooperative in Northern California. Our
numbers are growing rapidly, and we're looking to expand from a half-
cab to a full-cab in the next few months. We'll probably also expand
from our current [EMAIL PROTECTED] to at least [EMAIL PROTECTED], but we'
25 matches
Mail list logo
