On May 3, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What
is relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
a) the email considered for rejection is actually wanted
b) and wanted by AOL employees themselves
And if they did know how to a
On May 3, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Peter Dambier wrote:
How do you count DoS and SPAM? They are not wanted. Do you charge
for them?
Of course. Life sux and then you die.
ravi wrote:
Hello all,
read through the charter/guidelines and I believe (hopefully correctly!)
that my questions are not out of place. I am looking for advice on usage
based billing solutions. I am interested both in the data collector /
collection part and the billing part, and would ideally
Sounds a whole bunch like you have a PMTUD (Path MTU Discovery) issue.
Change the MTU on a host to be smaller and see if this fixes the
issue... If it does, there are a bunch of networking tricks you can
play to fix it for all of the customers. MSS rewrite is one,
clearing the DF BIt on a
We don't use PPOE. Our network setup is DSL Modem -->ATM-->BLC
(Occam)-->IP--->Router--->Transit provider. Basically we turn on the
service and it's always running. We don't require any authentication or
do any subscriber management on our users. I will start looking into
the MTU issue though.
For what's it's worth you could use ping and the "don't fragment" switch
to test MTU sizes.
Rob
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Shane Owens wrote:
Can anyone give me any suggestions as to what routes to take to
troubleshoot this? Logic tell me that is I have reach ability a
Jim Popovitch wrote:
Matthew Black wrote:
I've been dealing with this too for 6 days now (2 of them while away on
vacation).
My sympathies.
Sure there are spam
problems, but to block requested email from reaching interested users
(some of them being AOL employees themselves)
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Shane Owens wrote:
Can anyone give me any suggestions as to what routes to take to
troubleshoot this? Logic tell me that is I have reach ability and one
browser work but another doesn't it's a software problem with either the
browser or the site, but being able to take the
All, I know this probably isn't the best forum for this question but I'd
like to rule out a network problem before I tell a customer he has a PC
problem. I run a small CLEC network that is single homed to BTN for
transit. I have 3 sites all interconnected via DS3's and provide DSL
services from
Matthew Black wrote:
We've noticed a surge in 421 e-mail errors from AOL.
Message soft bounced for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '4.3.2 - Not accepting messages
at this time ('421', [': (DYN:T1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dynt1.html', 'SERVICE NOT
AVAILABLE']) []'
It seems as though
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
>
> We've noticed a surge in 421 e-mail errors from AOL.
>
> Message soft bounced for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '4.3.2 - Not
> accepting messages at
> this time ('421', [': (DYN:T1)
> http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dynt1.html', 'SE
We've noticed a surge in 421 e-mail errors from AOL.
Message soft bounced for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '4.3.2 - Not accepting messages at
this time ('421', [': (DYN:T1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dynt1.html', 'SERVICE NOT
AVAILABLE']) []'
It seems as though they've tightened down
This is nothing but a back door tax to stick your
customers, who will have to pay for them being spied
on in the first place, NDA not withstanding
-Henry
--- Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just wanted to bring your attention to an FCC
> decsion today
> that will most likely touch yo
At 11:31 AM 5/3/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID = 0xB4D3D7B0
*** Signed: 5/3/2006 11:31:44 AM
*** Verified: 5/3/2006 2:50:05 PM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
On Wed, 03 May 2006 07:47
Hello all,
read through the charter/guidelines and I believe (hopefully correctly!)
that my questions are not out of place. I am looking for advice on usage
based billing solutions. I am interested both in the data collector /
collection part and the billing part, and would ideally want separati
Just wanted to bring your attention to an FCC decsion today
that will most likely touch your operational lives in a big way.
[snip]
Broadband providers and Internet phone companies will have to
pick up the tab for the cost of building in mandatory wiretap
access for police surveillance, federal
At 11:52 AM 5/3/2006, Peter Wohlers wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> At 10:11 PM 5/2/2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:40:43PM -0700, Tim Pozar wrote:
>> > UL is seeing a large DDOS coming towards a couple of customers of ours.
>> > I know that other ISPs have
The tier nomenclature also a really good way to instigate flame fests on
lists such as this.
Regards
Marshall
On May 3, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Joe Provo wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0700, Robert Sherrard wrote:
What make a provider a tier 2, versus a tier 1 provider...
Marketin
Robert Sherrard wrote:
What make a provider a tier 2, versus a tier 1 provider...
"We are a tier 1 provider" = "I am a salesperson."
"They are a tier 2 provider." = "I am a salesperson and they are our
competitor".
> Is it possible to determine who a tier 2 (i.e. Cogent) leases fiber from
At 01:58 AM 5/3/2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tier_1_carrier
As of this exact moment that I'm posting, that article is actually
reasonably accurate. Of course I'm sure in 5 minutes 100 people will be
Berkman, Scott wrote:
> Interesting to notice someone (pe
On May 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Todd Underwood wrote:
to underline a point made previously though: Tier-1 is a routing
architecture term that doesn't have any useful direct bearing in how
best to select a service provider.
s/routing architecture/business/
It is possible to be a "Tier Two" prov
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0700, Robert Sherrard wrote:
>
> What make a provider a tier 2, versus a tier 1 provider...
Marketing.
The nomenclature is a completelyy irrelevant hangover of
the NSFnet days when people thought in terms of "the backbone".
If your providers' value is only
Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> At 10:11 PM 5/2/2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:40:43PM -0700, Tim Pozar wrote:
>> > UL is seeing a large DDOS coming towards a couple of customers of ours.
>> > I know that other ISPs have been affected as well. I will let them
>>
so annoying.
people keep trying to add several non-tier-1 providers in there.
cogent 174 : no. buys transit from 2914 (NTT america/verio)
btn 3491 : no. buys from savvis 3561 i believe
ft 5511 : no. buys from sprint 1239
i'm pretty sure i saw some other silly ones in there, too, but i can'
On Wed, 03 May 2006 07:47:20 PDT, "Berkman, Scott" said:
> Interesting to notice someone (perhaps from this list?) has removed
> Cogent from the T1 list.
Wishful thinking from somebody carrying a grudge at Level3?
(ducks) :)
pgpmzdStuyLs6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Interesting to notice someone (perhaps from this list?) has removed
Cogent from the T1 list. They did however leave
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogent alone.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Martin Hannigan
Sent: Wednesday
You can find the feeds we (myself and Nick Feamster) collect at the
RON testbed at
http://www.datapository.net/data/
(the two subdirs - bgpup and bgptables - should be fairly self-
explanatory.)
Note that some of the data we have in there is Abilene routing data.
While we have a faithfu
At 01:58 AM 5/3/2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0700, Robert Sherrard wrote:
>
> What make a provider a tier 2, versus a tier 1 provider...
>
> Is it possible to determine who a tier 2 (i.e. Cogent) leases fiber from?
It has absolutely nothing to do with
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>
> What make a provider a tier 2, versus a tier 1 provider...
>
This has been answered by Richard, but to put my two cents in - you
shouldn't care. There is very little correlation between performance
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Ricardo V. Oliveira wrote:
> I was wondering where I can find recent BGP data in the form of BGP
> updates+RIBs besides RouteViews and RIPE?
We don't save updates, but if you want RIBs, we've got them back to 1997.
Recent years are online at:
http://www.pch.ne
On Wed, 03 May 2006 06:32:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> er... a typo? should be... "... we turn ON the phones in their NOC."
No, turning the phones *on* is what you do to their help desk. :)
Turning off the phones shouldn't inconvenience a NOC that much, since most
of the people the
31 matches
Mail list logo
