For those who havent already received any of the dozen mails:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-378.html
(btw the link in the mail from RIPE is wrong)
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-378.txt
Regards,
Jonas
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-10may06.htm
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:46:40 -0400
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip@v2.listbox.com
Subject: [IP] ICANN rejects .xxx domain
Begin forwarded message:
As reported in:
Why?
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere
else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
william(at)elan.net wrote:
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-10may06.htm
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 11
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dewayne Hendricks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 10, 2006 6:59:52 PM EDT
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] AOL Starts to Charge for Receiving eMail, DearAOL
responds
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Note: Posted on the behalf
Why?
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere
else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
Because once you separate them out, the government is free to slap a tax on
.xxx websites.
Geo.
Well,
It is always the same thing with this type of thread...
Lets try to expand beyond the obvious shall we?
Francisco Obispo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Legislate where?..in the US ? in Canada ? Venezuela ? in Colombia? in
Brazil ? .
What is
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 11 12:41:20 2006
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:22 -0400
From: Alain Hebert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:46:40 -0400
From: David
On Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:22 EDT, Alain Hebert said:
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere
else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
The problem is that it's a TLD, not .xxx.us. What standard of porn
do you intend to enforce?
Thus spake Alain Hebert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why?
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere else
than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
And exactly which legislature has the authority to prevent porn sites
registering in any other
Also, who is to say what is offensive or dangerous to
children? You don't seriously think that only pr0n would be
forced into the .xxx TLD, do you?
(Aactually, it's pretty funny that anyone in their right mind
would expect this happen anyway.)
I can also see cases where someone's blog get's
On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:57:36 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
Note also: attempting to impose additional restrictions on _existant_,
registered domains would likely constitute breach of contract. With
big liabilities attached -- look at what the hijacking of 'sex.com' ended
up costing the registrar
the how-to-label problem has been around since the w3c's pics effort.
the jurisdictional issue is aterritorial, as the cctlds cover that,
and the authority, nominally, is a 501(c)(3) in marina del rey, and,
purely contractual, as is the registry restricted to cooperative entities
and the
On Thu, 11 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:22 EDT, Alain Hebert said:
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere
else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
The problem is that it's a TLD, not .xxx.us. What
So ICANN did come to their senses finally and prevented another collission
in balkan namespace :)
; DiG 9.1.3 -t any XXX @TLD2.NEWDOTNET.NET
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 34062
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY:
On May 11, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Peter Dambier wrote:
So ICANN did come to their senses finally and prevented another
collission
in balkan namespace :)
Thankyou ICANN for your continued support of alternative roots.
If you think *that's* why .XXX died, then I have a small bridge to
sell you
At 2:43 PM -0400 05:11:2006, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
the how-to-label problem has been around since the w3c's pics effort.
the jurisdictional issue is aterritorial,
Negative. 92% of the root is under US jurisdiction with most ccTLD's
riding on that infrastructure. I'm in the process of
On 5/11/06, Derek J. Balling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 11, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Peter Dambier wrote:
So ICANN did come to their senses finally and prevented another collission
in balkan namespace :)
If you think *that's* why .XXX died, then I have a small bridge to
sell you providing
Why?
If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere
else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.
The major problem with this is that many other governments have
dangerous
ideas that they'd also like to be easily able to identify
David Schwartz wrote:
The major problem with this is that many other governments have
dangerous
ideas that they'd also like to be easily able to identify and isolate as
well. If the United States gets to corral porn, why can't China corral
Democracy? Why can't Russia corral advocates
On May 11, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Why not just plain ole hostnames like nanog, www.nanog, mail.nanog
For the same reason DNS was created in the first place. You will
recall that we actually HAD a hostname file that we traded around...
At 11:42 PM 5/11/2006, Jim Popovitch wrote:
David Schwartz wrote:
The major problem with this is that many other governments
have dangerous
ideas that they'd also like to be easily able to identify and isolate as
well. If the United States gets to corral porn, why can't China corral
21 matches
Mail list logo
