Hi,
First, thanks goes to all that has replied, I was asked by people to
summarize the replies i got so far on the topic, so here it goes:
1- Someone said that they are doing very well in the IPTV and multicast, but they are not in the US.
2- Another one said: Huawei's data-comm products have
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hi,
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
plan to set the mod bit on them too very soon.
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti
Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hi,
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
plan to set the mod bit on them too very soon.
So people
Hi!
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come up with a
list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we plan to set
the mod bit on them too very soon.
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
they don't get moderated :)
I
On 7/6/06, Raymond Dijkxhoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we plan to set the mod bit on them too very soon.
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to
Sabri Berisha said the following on 6/7/2006 19:32:
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
they don't get moderated :)
Not sure I am real, but I do lurk.
Sabri Berisha said the following on 6/7/2006 19:32:
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
they don't get moderated :)
Not sure I am real, but I do lurk.
What about all of the unreal lurkers? :-)
Jim Popovitch wrote:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
The spammers have figured out how to bypass the NANOG members-only
posting, in this case by pretending to be John Fraizer and sending
directly to trapdoor.
On our public list servers we now require admin approval of all new
subscriptions
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hi,
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
plan to set the mod bit on them too very
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:28:40 -, Marko Milivojevic said:
What about all of the unreal lurkers? :-)
Not to mention the rational, irrational, transcendental, and imaginary lurkers.
Wait a minute, *I am not a number, I am a free man*.
pgpl9dD1Evi1v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I still comment here periodically when it is prudent to do so, I set this email
account specifically for Nanog,
anticipating spam
-Henry
sage
From: Dominic J. Eidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re: NANOG Spam?
On Thu, 6 Jul
There is a new player on the block that I see more and more
http://www.infoblox.com/company/
-Henry
- Original Message
From: Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2006 11:16:39 AM
Subject: Re: DNS Based Load Balancers
As someone who has also
There is a new player on the block that I see more and more
http://www.infoblox.com/company/
infoblox isn't new. i'm familiar with them since they use BIND as their
DNS protocol engine, and are long time members of the ISC BIND Forum. i
recently did colour commentary for an
Henry Linneweh wrote:
I still comment here periodically when it is prudent to do so, I set this email
account specifically for Nanog,
anticipating spam
-Henry
sage
From: Dominic J. Eidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:32:11PM +0200, Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hi,
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
plan to set the
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
I'm immoderate. But I believe that Popovitch was speaking of different
mailing lists than this one.
Yes that is true, at least the part about the lists. ;-) I run a
mailing list discussion system for a few non-profits, it is those lists
(and their admins) that I was
Does anyone have a contact at Brightmail besides
[EMAIL PROTECTED] A phone number off-list would be nice.
Malcolm Staudinger
Postmaster
Dotster, Inc.
Sabri Berisha said the following on 6/7/2006 19:32:
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
they don't get moderated :)
Not sure I am real, but I do lurk.
I sometimes feel the same way..
--
-- Welcome My Son, Welcome To The Machine --
I shut the last down a few days ago, actually: a piece of spam mail
went through the list and one of the few remaining subscribers got
trigger-happy and complained to _my_ isp about it. Since no other
mail had gone over the list in months, I yanked it.
It was a lovely idea, but never really
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:43:48 + (GMT), Christopher L. Morrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, David W. Hankins wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:07:33PM -0700, Allen Parker wrote:
Why not, on a regular basis, use ssh-keyscan and diff or something
similar, to scan
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 04:52:52PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:43:48 + (GMT), Christopher L. Morrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apparently kerberos scares people... I'm not sure I 'get' that, but :( A
corp security group once for a long time 'didnt believe in
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:43:48 + (GMT), Christopher L. Morrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, David W. Hankins wrote:
So, here's my why not just:
Why not just use Kerberos?
apparently kerberos scares
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 04:52:52PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:43:48 + (GMT), Christopher L. Morrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apparently kerberos scares people... I'm not sure I 'get' that, but :( A
corp
23 matches
Mail list logo
