Some of our users (on a large Irish webmail domain) are complaining
that they're not getting email from you.
As far as I can tell we're not blocking any email at all from you gentlemen
I'd appreciate a mailops contact from Ryan Air hitting me offlist and
helping me troubleshoot this from your e
Can someone from Qwest shoot me an email. I have a PSTN carrier routing
VoIP now and they're telling me your routing tables became corrupt or
something. Calls have been "a" dropping.
=
Signature removed to conform to NANOG On-Topic Police
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:51:34AM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote:
>
> Can someone from Qwest shoot me an email. I have a PSTN carrier routing
> VoIP now and they're telling me your routing tables became corrupt or
> something. Calls have been "a" dropping.
>
> ===
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:51:34AM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote:
Can someone from Qwest shoot me an email. I have a PSTN carrier routing
VoIP now and they're telling me your routing tables became corrupt or
something. Calls have been "a" dropping.
=
Hopefully
this will be my last time querying the group for provider experience.
My previous experience with them was a while back when they filed for
bankruptcy and cut back on support, but a coworker just informed me
they have since been purchased by Level3. Is there anyone here that has
any cross
Elijah Savage wrote:
>Hopefully this will be my last time querying the group for
provider experience. My previous experience with them was a while back when
they filed for bankruptcy and cut back on support, but a coworker just informed
me they have since been purchased by Level3. I
Elijah Savage wrote:
> Hopefully this will be my last time querying the group for provider
> experience. My previous experience with them was a while back when they
> filed for bankruptcy and cut back on support, but a coworker just
> informed me they have since been purchased by Level3. Is there
On 8/23/06, Randy Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When a company is acquired by Level(3), they are assimilated rather quickly.
The company you would be dealing with is Level(3), so make your decisions
based on that.
if by "assimilated rather quickly" you mean "answers the phone with
'Lev
Aaron Glenn wrote:
>if by "assimilated rather quickly" you mean "answers the phone with
>'Level3' instead of 'Wiltel' " then yes, they are. Otherwise it's the
>same network with the same equipment and generally the same people
>pre-acquisition
I would think that Elijah was looking slightly longe
I'm wondering what an Irish webhosting firm having trouble with a British
cut-rate airlines sending e-mail has to do with "North American Network
Operations?" . . . .
On the NANOG "is it operational?" sniff test, I'd grade this one a straight
"D".
Jay Stewart
P.S., as for the Post Script, I gi
Anyone
experiencing latency to hp.com from anywhere in the UK?
thanks
(I know little about AMS-IX and am still waiting for someone from there
to get back to me...)
My NA bandwidth right now is ~200Mbps and about half of that appears to
be EU destined. I'm opening an EU POP soon and am trying to figure out
what sort of value AMS-IX would give me.
Does it si
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, matthew zeier wrote:
Does it simply provide an easy way to privately connect to transit and
peers? Or can I also go crazy and peer with anyone who wants to peer
(like in the olden day!) ?
There are plenty of ISPs both at AMSIX and LINX and they're mostly very
happy to p
I’m trying to make contact with an email admin for
Time Warner Cable – San Diego
(@san.rr.com). If you’re here, can you contact me off-list?
Thanks,
Cary Fields
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, matthew zeier wrote:
>
>> Does it simply provide an easy way to privately connect to transit and
>> peers? Or can I also go crazy and peer with anyone who wants to peer
>> (like in the olden da
On 21-Aug-2006, at 11:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, so perhaps i'm not a "newbie"...
the nanog web site indicates that registration opens in midAugust.
on my calender, 21aug is clearly past the mid-point, yet i see
no way to register to attend nanog 38.
The ad-hoc, semi-organised and random collection of people who
maintain the NANOG mailing list FAQ have been working for the past
little while on relocating the information contained in that document
to a wiki, so that it can be maintained by the community in general
in the general Way of
If it's a sanctioned thing, perhaps a cname for wiki.nanog.org would be in
order?
- billn
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> The ad-hoc, semi-organised and random collection of people who maintain the
> NANOG mailing list FAQ have been working for the past little while on
> relocatin
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Randy Epstein wrote:
I would think that Elijah was looking slightly longer term than
pre-acquisition. Based on when Level(3) made the acquisition announcement,
I'd guess that they are fairly close to completing it, and if you've noticed
the changes at some of their other r
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Matt Ghali wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Wed Aug 23 17:47:26 $ dig +short ptr 1.2.2.4.in-addr.arpa
vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net.
i'm not sure why my brain thought VZ when you said L3, but at least
they rhyme. Apolgies, folks.
matto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignation is a te
20 matches
Mail list logo
