All:
Voting for the 2006 NANOG SC and Charter amendments is now open.
Refer to https://www.merit.edu/nanog/election/. Reminder you will need to
use your NANOG id and password to cast your vote.
The process will close on Tuesday at 3 EDT. The results will be shared at
the close of NANOG38.
Hey all, attempting to assess something related to networking but its on
the SIP/telephony side of things. I'd like to know how many have had
success and failures with route dampening. Purpose of this question is,
I'm wondering about a method a VoIP PBX could take similar to BGP's
dampening whe
FYI... ifyou think you have an opinion about this, it might be worth a read
before the IESG dictates how you can use/code these badboys...
-
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers '
- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers '
as an Informational RFC
and what is good or bad about this representation? seems simple to me.
and having one notation seems reasonable. what am i missing?
randy
5 0.so-1-0-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.17) 2.173 ms 2.419
ms 2.228 ms
6 127.ATM4-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.202) 287.247 ms
287.482 ms 287.548 ms
7 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.137) 287.316 ms
287.743 ms 288.016 ms
5 0.so-5-1-0.GW6.SJC1.ALTER.NE
Wil,
My traffic enters Alternet in LAX (but not SJC). I've been seeing a
great deal of latency and packet loss through LAX1<->SEA1 for the last
few hours.
The problem seemed to spike about 20 minutes ago.
Cheers
-Jonathan
via Alternet.William Schultz wrote:
5 0.so-1-0-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTE
No idea w.r.t. SIP, but I assume that you have seen this?
"BGP Route Flap Dampening Considered Harmful"
http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-378.html
- ferg
-- "J. Oquendo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all, attempting to assess something related to networking but its on
the SIP/telephony side of t
I've spoke to MCI, which is our hand off... They say things are okay
now (as of about 15 minutes ago). Problem was caused by "high
utilization", unknown what device.
Are you still seeing latency? I've got that circuit shut down so I'm
blind.
-Wil
On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Jonathan Cl
Hey Wil,
By having the circuit shut down do you mean its shut down from your end?
If so, why not just bring up the link and deactivate the ospf neighbors,
that way you can still have a vantage point to monitor the problem while
not having any impact on your networks traffic.
Cheers,
--Payam
If you're from Mediacom and can help out with this request, I'd very
much appreciate your help. We've been added to your DNS blacklist and
need to be removed.
Thank you,
Charles
-
Charles Scheidecker phone : +1.319.2
Should have let you all know earlier, that's basically what I did.
Brought up the interface without BGP and tests are okay from my view.
-Wil
On Oct 9, 2006, at 6:54 PM, Payam Tarverdyan Chychi wrote:
Hey Wil,
By having the circuit shut down do you mean its shut down from your
end? If
These lightning talks will be presented during the Tuesday
plenary at NANOG 38, beginning at 11:00 CDT:
4 byte ASNs - Geoff Huston
Higher Speed Ethernet - Peter Schoenmaker
Internet2 DNSSEC Pilot - A Reverse Tree for the Holidays - Larry
Blunk
Route Aggregation Recommendations - Phili
Randy Bush wrote:
- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers '
as an
Informational RFC
and what is good or bad about this representation? seems simple to me.
and having one notation seems reasonable. what am i missing?
Using '.' as a delimiter will be somewhat annoying when
13 matches
Mail list logo
