Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi *, in august IANA handed 77/8 78/8 79/8 to RIPE which started handing out those ranges 2 months ago. We (Telefonica Deutschland AS6805) are seeing a lot of reachability problems most likely caused by not updated bogon filters. For testing purposes 77.181.114.4 aka bogon.mediaways.net is up fo

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Houston
Florian Lohoff wrote: Hi *, in august IANA handed 77/8 78/8 79/8 to RIPE which started handing out those ranges 2 months ago. We (Telefonica Deutschland AS6805) are seeing a lot of reachability problems most likely caused by not updated bogon filters. For testing purposes 77.181.114.4 aka bogo

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Jack Bates
Allan Houston wrote: This probably isn't helped much by sites like completewhois.com still showing these ranges as bogons.. http://www.completewhois.com/bogons/active_bogons.htm They've ignored all my attempts to get them to update so far.. sigh.. They just need someone using the address s

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Chris L. Morrow
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jack Bates wrote: > > Allan Houston wrote: > > This probably isn't helped much by sites like completewhois.com still > > showing these ranges as bogons.. > > > > http://www.completewhois.com/bogons/active_bogons.htm > > > > They've ignored all my attempts to get them to updat

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread bmanning
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:40:41AM -0600, Jack Bates wrote: > > Allan Houston wrote: > >This probably isn't helped much by sites like completewhois.com still > >showing these ranges as bogons.. > > > >http://www.completewhois.com/bogons/active_bogons.htm > > > >They've ignored all my attempts to

RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Scott Morris
So we're saying that a lawsuit is an intelligent method to force someone else to correct something that you are simply using to avoid the irritation of manually updating things yourself??? That seems to be the epitomy of laziness vs. litigousness. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
no, he's saying that a lawsuit is a useful method of forcing someone who is intentionally or negligently distributing incorrect information that other people who do not know any better then believe and use in their own networks. i betcha libel laws aren't written in such a way that they are usef

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Houston
Scott Morris wrote: So we're saying that a lawsuit is an intelligent method to force someone else to correct something that you are simply using to avoid the irritation of manually updating things yourself??? That seems to be the epitomy of laziness vs. litigousness. Scott -Original Mess

RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Donald Stahl
So we're saying that a lawsuit is an intelligent method to force someone else to correct something that you are simply using to avoid the irritation of manually updating things yourself??? That seems to be the epitomy of laziness vs. litigousness. I think the point is that people are trusting t

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Jack Bates
Scott Morris wrote: So we're saying that a lawsuit is an intelligent method to force someone else to correct something that you are simply using to avoid the irritation of manually updating things yourself??? That seems to be the epitomy of laziness vs. litigousness. Scott I would doubt t

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Jared Mauch
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:28:27AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > > > no, he's saying that a lawsuit is a useful method of forcing someone > who is intentionally or negligently distributing incorrect information > that other people who do not know any better then believe and use in > their o

Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)

2006-12-11 Thread Luke C
of course, my company is working on two main tasks: the first team is focused on discovering what is the virus, and what is the best anti-virus. instead, my team has already scaled our DNS service, by doubling the number of DNSs. I'm not completely satisfied by the "scaling solution": I wish to f

Another bogon block: 2001:678::/29 (Was: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8)

2006-12-11 Thread Jeroen Massar
[After the very short IANAL part, an operational part wrt 2001:678::/29] Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > > no, he's saying that a lawsuit is a useful method of forcing someone > who is intentionally or negligently distributing incorrect information > that other people who do not know any better then

Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)

2006-12-11 Thread Luke C
I use to slave "." which can save time on recursive DNS servers when they have a lot of dross to answer (assuming it is totally random dross). I'm not sure to understand your solution. You configure your name-server as a slave-root-server? On 12/8/06, Simon Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Stephen Satchell
Jared Mauch wrote: linking to stuff like the bogon-announce list too wouldn't be a bad idea either :) Bogon announce list?

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Jeroen Massar
Stephen Satchell wrote: > > Jared Mauch wrote: >> linking to stuff like the bogon-announce list too wouldn't >> be a bad idea either :) > > > Bogon announce list? Read here: http://www.cymru.com/ And you will find: http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/bogon-announce Btw it is the first

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jared Mauch: > My recommendation is to write a letter (in german) and fax it > over to their fax# with the urls clearly written out (eg: iana vs > their url) showing the problem with the address space. it'll likely > sufficently confuse someone that they'll be curious and research it > a

Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)

2006-12-11 Thread Simon Waters
On Monday 11 December 2006 16:15, you wrote: > > I use to slave "." which can save time on recursive DNS servers when they have > >a lot of dross to answer (assuming it is totally random dross). > > I'm not sure to understand your solution. > You configure your name-server as a slave-root-server?

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Jon Lewis
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: no, he's saying that a lawsuit is a useful method of forcing someone who is intentionally or negligently distributing incorrect information that other people who do not know any better then believe and use in their own networks. i betcha libel law

Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)

2006-12-11 Thread Matt Ghali
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Simon Waters wrote: Yes. Most of the root server traffic is answering queries with "NXDOMAIN" for non-existant top level domains, if you slave root on your recursive servers, your recursive servers can answer those queries directly (from the 120KB root zone file), rather

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread william(at)elan.net
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Allan Houston wrote: Florian Lohoff wrote: Hi *, in august IANA handed 77/8 78/8 79/8 to RIPE which started handing out those ranges 2 months ago. We (Telefonica Deutschland AS6805) are seeing a lot of reachability problems most likely caused by not updated bogon filte

Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Simon Waters wrote: > >> Yes. Most of the root server traffic is answering queries with >> "NXDOMAIN" for non-existant top level domains, if you slave root >> on your recursive servers, your recursive servers can answer those >> q

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread Chris L. Morrow
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, william(at)elan.net wrote: > Completewhois email server is down right now and needs to be rebuilt. what no backup MX? now postmaster/abuse/root working emails at that domain? did you put the domain also on 'rfc ignorant'?

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-11 Thread william(at)elan.net
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Chris L. Morrow wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, william(at)elan.net wrote: Completewhois email server is down right now and needs to be rebuilt. what no backup MX? now postmaster/abuse/root working emails at that domain? did you put the domain also on 'rfc ignorant'? Mai