Re: Curious question on hop identity...

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Rothschild
On 2006-12-14-02:24:52, Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may be far afield insofar as topic fodder Not in the slightest. To the contrary, it's one of the more on-topic postings I've seen as of late, and I mean that with all sincerity. > I am curious if anyone knows exactly what these tw

Re: Curious question on hop identity...

2006-12-13 Thread alex
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Fergie wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > This may be far afield insofar as topic fodder, but I am curious if > anyone knows exactly what these two hops [9] [10] below, actually are? Wouldn't you like to know? -- Alex Pilosov| DSL, Colocatio

Curious question on hop identity...

2006-12-13 Thread Fergie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This may be far afield insofar as topic fodder, but I am curious if anyone knows exactly what these two hops [9] [10] below, actually are? [snip] [...] 5 165 ms 161 ms 183 ms 10g-9-1-ur04.sanjose.ca.sfba.comcast.net [68.87. 192.49] 6

SatCom communications alert

2006-12-13 Thread Fergie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just as an FYI, radio communications, satellites communications, and power grids (including some SCADA systems) could face potential interruptions or damage tomorrow due to some very odd (out of cycle) solar activity. Story here: http://www.msnbc.msn

RE: GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread Bill Nash
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > > this morning around <3> am, effecting <2> connections in that > > You mean 'affecting.' Pobody's nerfect. - billn

RE: GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread Alex Rubenstein
> this morning around <3> am, effecting <2> connections in that You mean 'affecting.' -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-13 Thread Jack Bates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One wonders whether it might not be more effective in the long run to sue ICANN/IANA rather than suing completewhois.com. Of course, it could be that I used the wrong term. IANAL after all. Perhaps the right term was injunction? Does that qualify as a lawsuit? Unfor

GBLX (or other) issue continuing (?)

2006-12-13 Thread Rick Kunkel
Hello folks, I've gotten a couple of calls from people today complaining about a spike in latency when using GBLX paths. I saw a couple of posts asking about potential GBLX issues yesterday. (But they seemed to devolve into mild flaming, and I couldn't glean any useful info from them, except th

Re: GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread Matt Taber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saved for future use... Classic. ~ Matt Taber [EMAIL PROTECTED] WMIS Internet http://www.wmis.net 616-281-9647 1-888-482-9647 "Accelerate ... It's a Speed Thing" PGP:

Re: GBLX issues anyone?

2006-12-13 Thread Tony Varriale
We had some issues out of indy yesterday afternoon and night but cleared up sometime before midnight. Symptom was 250+ms response on first hop into their network. tv - Original Message - From: "J. Oquendo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 7:54 AM Subject:

Re: GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread Bill Nash
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Aaron Glenn wrote: > On 12/13/06, J. Oquendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anyone seeing issues for GBLX around NY? > > > dude, chill. no need to yell. > you know, GBLX sells a lot of different stuff - are we talking IP > transit, MPLS transport, wavelength, voice? what

Re: GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread Aaron Glenn
On 12/13/06, J. Oquendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone seeing issues for GBLX around NY? DISCLAIMER: I WOULD HAVE POSTED TO THE OUTAGE LIST BUT THAT WOULD MAKE 100+ MAILING LISTS APOLOGIES TO THE OTP (OFF-TOPIC POLICE) dude, chill. no need to yell. you know, GBLX sells a lot of differen

RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-13 Thread william(at)elan.net
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not just incorrect data. The design of the system used by completewhois is flawed at the core. No more so that other systems that rely on automation with some human involvement but see below as I generally agree with what you meant. They on

Re: GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, J. Oquendo wrote: Anyone seeing issues for GBLX around NY? Do you have traceroutes or other useful data to illustrate said broken-ness? jms

GBLX issues anyone?

2006-12-13 Thread J. Oquendo
Anyone seeing issues for GBLX around NY? DISCLAIMER: I WOULD HAVE POSTED TO THE OUTAGE LIST BUT THAT WOULD MAKE 100+ MAILING LISTS APOLOGIES TO THE OTP (OFF-TOPIC POLICE) -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo echo @infiltrated|sed 's/^/sil/g;s/$/.net/g' http://pgp.mi

RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-13 Thread Michael . Dillon
> B) Threaten the bogon list operator with a lawsuit for falsely claiming your > addresses are bogons and hope they take the simplest path and fix their > list. > > This is a pretty classic case of someone inducing other people to rely on > the accuracy of their data and then offering incorrect

GBLX issues?

2006-12-13 Thread J. Oquendo
Anyone seeing issues for GBLX around NY? DISCLAIMER: I WOULD HAVE POSTED TO THE OUTAGE LIST BUT THAT WOULD MAKE 100+ MAILING LISTS APOLOGIES TO THE OTP (OFF-TOPIC POLICE) -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo echo @infiltrated|sed 's/^/sil/g;s/$/.net/g' http://pgp.mi

RE: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-13 Thread David Schwartz
> So we're saying that a lawsuit is an intelligent method to force someone > else to correct something that you are simply using to avoid the > irritation > of manually updating things yourself??? > > That seems to be the epitomy of laziness vs. litigousness. > > Scott No, but a lawsuit may be a

Re: Bogon Filter - Please check for 77/8 78/8 79/8

2006-12-13 Thread Andrei Robachevsky
Florian Lohoff wrote: > Hi *, > in august IANA handed 77/8 78/8 79/8 to RIPE which started handing out > those ranges 2 months ago. > > We (Telefonica Deutschland AS6805) are seeing a lot of reachability problems > most likely caused by not updated bogon filters. > > For testing purposes 77.181.