Re: BGP Problem on 04/16/2007

Andre Oppermann wrote: Audie Onibala wrote: Yesterday on 04/16/07 between 3:00 - 3:45 PM we had sporadic Internet problem. Our ISP's are Sprint and Qwest. Around that time there was quite a bit sunspot activity and the moon had an unusual position too. The NOC contacts of your ISP's probab

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

Hi Patrick, On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Apr 17, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Yi Wang wrote: I guess what I see there is the lower bound of the path diversity? Because even though an edge router received more than one path for a prefix, it'll only export the best rou

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

On Apr 17, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Yi Wang wrote: I guess what I see there is the lower bound of the path diversity? Because even though an edge router received more than one path for a prefix, it'll only export the best route to the other edge routers of the ISP. Depends on the route server.

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

I guess what I see there is the lower bound of the path diversity? Because even though an edge router received more than one path for a prefix, it'll only export the best route to the other edge routers of the ISP. Yi On Apr 17, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Ricardo V. Oliveira wrote: Telnet to an

Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground

In a message written on Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:42:53PM -0700, David W. Hankins wrote: > Both of these two progression trees represent the cumulative > formulation of knowledge: Users are stupid. Automatic is not > just best, it's the only way. [snip] > The main point, is that if you leave "all

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

Telnet to any of these route servers: http://www.bgp4.net/wiki/doku.php?id=tools:ipv4_route_servers and do "show ip bgp" --Ricardo On Apr 17, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Yi Wang wrote: I should have said I'm interested in the merged size of RIB-In (which contains all the raw routes received). I c

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

On Apr 17, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Yi Wang wrote: I couldn't find information about the number of different routes for the same prefix a (large) AS typically receives/learns. Hints? I'd suggest taking a look at the RIBs from routeviews.org or RIPE and performing an analysis on same. Some SPs

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

I should have said I'm interested in the merged size of RIB-In (which contains all the raw routes received). I couldn't find information about the number of different routes for the same prefix a (large) AS typically receives/learns. Hints? Yi On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Jeroen Massar

UK ISP threatens security researcher

http://www.theregister.com/2007/04/17/hackers_service_terminated/ "A 21-year-old college student in London had his internet service terminated and was threatened with legal action after publishing details of a critical vulnerability that can compromise the security of the ISP's subscribers." I h

Re: Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

Yi Wang wrote: > > Hi, > > Could anyone give me a sense how many BGP routes a large ISP typically > sees in total? > Here by "in total", I mean if the RIB of all routers in the ISP were > merged, how many distinctive > routes would there be? Google(route bgp) "I am feelink lucky" aka first hit,

Number of BGP routes a large ISP sees in total

Hi, Could anyone give me a sense how many BGP routes a large ISP typically sees in total? Here by "in total", I mean if the RIB of all routers in the ISP were merged, how many distinctive routes would there be? Thanks, Yi

.uk SLD history (was Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8)

This posting is not too relevant to the NANOG thread, but there are some places where IMHO the record needs to be set straight: Alexander Harrowell wrote: > 025/8 Jan 95 UK Ministry of Defense (Updated - Jan 06) > NetRange: 25.0.0.0 - 25.255.255.255

Re: (very few) AAAA websites

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Niels Bakker wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlos Friacas) [Tue 17 Apr 2007, 10:38 CEST]: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: Not "major content sites", but these are some web sites with records that people may be visiting for other reasons than just IPv6

Re: BGP Problem on 04/16/2007

Audie Onibala wrote: Yesterday on 04/16/07 between 3:00 - 3:45 PM we had sporadic Internet problem. Our ISP's are Sprint and Qwest. Around that time there was quite a bit sunspot activity and the moon had an unusual position too. The NOC contacts of your ISP's probably may be of more specifi

BGP Problem on 04/16/2007

Yesterday on 04/16/07 between 3:00 - 3:45 PM we had sporadic Internet problem. Our ISP's are Sprint and Qwest. thanks, Audie Onibala 703-292-5316

Re: (very few) AAAA websites

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:56:02PM +0200, Niels Bakker wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlos Friacas) [Tue 17 Apr 2007, 10:38 CEST]: > >On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > >>Not "major content sites", but these are some web sites with records > >>that people may be visiting

Re: (very few) AAAA websites

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlos Friacas) [Tue 17 Apr 2007, 10:38 CEST]: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: Not "major content sites", but these are some web sites with records that people may be visiting for other reasons than just IPv6 tourism: [..] www.ams-ix.net internet ex

RE: (very few) AAAA websites, was: Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground

> > www.hitachi.co.jp > > this one is very interesting! :-) > does anybody know more from Japan, regarding largely known brands? They developed IPv6 shims for their Windows 95 network drivers to all PCs using their network cards to use IPv6. --Michael Dillon

RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8

> > And I know a company that has been using 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, > 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, > > 7/8 and 8/8 for many years, also behind NAT or on > non-Internet connected > > networks. But that is not what I am talking about here. > ... > > > And what happens if the legitimate owners of those already allocat

(very few) AAAA websites, was: Re: DHCPv6, was: Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground

Hi, On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: On 17-apr-2007, at 4:12, Stephen Sprunk wrote: I also don't know how they react when you try to contact a site that _does_ have records, since no major content site has them (which is a whole 'nother discussion). Not "major conten