Bandwidth Augmentation Triggers

Greetings, I'm working on a system to alert when a bandwidth augmentation is needed. I've looked at using both true averages and 95th percentile calculations. I'm wondering what everyone else uses for this purpose? We're talking about anything from a T1 to an OC-12 here. My guess is that the

AOL Help Request

If someone has a contact for a AOL mail Admin, could you please contact me off list. We just moved to new netblocks and are getting nowhere with the phone support or the [EMAIL PROTECTED] contacts. Jeffrey Sharpe CyberLynk Helpdesk and Support 414

Thanks (off topic yet again)

Thanks to the great folks on this list! Someone responded and the cable has been loaned! If anyone ever needs something in or around New Haven or Hartford just yell. -- J. Oquendo http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743 e

Extremely off topic but semi urgent

Anyone around 1533 Broadway NYC vicinity that has a loaner console cable for a customer who's router bit the bullet? Off list response appreciated... And apologies for disturbing the peace... -- J. Oquendo http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?

Re: BOGON Announcement question

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:12:16 +0100 > Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Collector: CIXP > > > Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 > > > > oh. any prefix of use is longer and hence is preferred > > > Right. Think of it as the world's largest

Re: BOGON Announcement question

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:12:16 +0100 Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Collector: CIXP > > Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 > > oh. any prefix of use is longer and hence is preferred > Right. Think of it as the world's largest packet telescope. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.

ARIN is allocating from 96/8,97/8,98/8,99/8

Hello- This announcement is being sent to multiple lists. Apologies for any duplicates. ARIN was issued the IPv4 address blocks 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, and 99/8 by the IANA on Oct. 3, 2006. ARIN is now issuing /20 and shorter prefixes from these blocks to customers. Network operators may wish to

URL for the Drone Armies C&C report

Those interested in the latest botnet C&C reports can find the most recent Drone Armies C&C report on Randal Vaughn

Re: BOGON Announcement question

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:16:03AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Jason Lewis wrote: > > >I'm seeing this announced at CIXP > > > >Collector: CIXP > >Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 > >Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z > >Peer: 192.65.185.140 > >Origin: 29222 > > > >My question

Re: BOGON Announcement question

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:16:03AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Jason Lewis wrote: > >I'm seeing this announced at CIXP > > > >Collector: CIXP > >Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 > >Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z > >Peer: 192.65.185.140 > >Origin: 29222 > > > >My question is, wh

Re: BOGON Announcement question

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Jason Lewis wrote: I'm seeing this announced at CIXP Collector: CIXP Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z Peer: 192.65.185.140 Origin: 29222 My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the announcement? Is it just not propagatin

Re: BOGON Announcement question

On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Randy Bush wrote: Collector: CIXP Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z Peer: 192.65.185.140 Origin: 29222 My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the announcement? because everyone with enough clue to watch what the

Re: BOGON Announcement question

> Collector: CIXP > Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 oh. any prefix of use is longer and hence is preferred randy

Re: BOGON Announcement question

> Collector: CIXP > Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 > Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z > Peer: 192.65.185.140 > Origin: 29222 > > My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the > announcement? because everyone with enough clue to watch what they receive has filters in place to pr

BOGON Announcement question

I'm seeing this announced at CIXP Collector: CIXP Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z Peer: 192.65.185.140 Origin: 29222 My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the announcement? Is it just not propagating out of the exchange? It's been announ

PANAP: free IX in Paris - France

Dear Collegues, Some of you may consider this email as a spam. However, can we really consider a free network service proposal as such? PANAP is a free IX located in Paris, France. Membership is completely free and we offer up to 10GE connection. All we ask you is to peer with us :) Currently o

BGP Session Timeout

I have a question regarding BGP session time outs. Is it likely that BGP times out before underlying IP topology reconvergences after a link/node failure? Do service providers ever set such low values of BGP timeouts that BGP timeout will occur? If not, what else may cause a BGP session to time