Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Ron da Silva
On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him... Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak. Both practices arguably ingenious or idiotic... Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Scott Weeks
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him... Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak. Both practices arguably ingenious or idiotic...

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Ron da Silva
On 5/2/07 2:58 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I gotta admit it's a really big .sig that's utterly useless. It *IS* being disseminated, distributed and copied and on a global basis. It's unlawful in what country? No one's going to delete all copies. Blah, blah, blah... I'll

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Warren Kumari
On May 2, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him... Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak. Both practices arguably

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Kradorex Xeron
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:08, Ron da Silva wrote: On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him... Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak. Both practices arguably ingenious or idiotic...

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Scott Weeks
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/07 2:58 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I gotta admit it's a really big .sig that's utterly useless. It *IS* being disseminated, distributed and copied and on a global basis. It's unlawful in what country? No one's going to delete all copies.

RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread andrew2
Warren Kumari wrote: On May 2, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him... Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak. Both

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Jay Hennigan
Ron da Silva wrote: I'll happily send your question to my IT and legal folks. :-) -ron Point out that you're sending the language to widely disseminated and archived mailing lists, and send them this as well NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged

Warning about UltraDNS terms

2007-05-02 Thread Sean Donelan
Although UltraDNS/Neustar gives month-to-month pricing, they actually have a 1 year term even if you cancel. So you may want to be aware of it in case you are just testing their service for a few months.

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Warren Kumari
On May 2, 2007, at 4:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Warren Kumari wrote: On May 2, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him...

Re: Warning about UltraDNS terms

2007-05-02 Thread Peter Beckman
Try DNSmadeEasy.com, cheesy name, great service and reliability. Much cheaper, anycasted. Not great for international, but perfect for US. It's DNS, not a $125,000/year line item. Beckman On Wed, 2 May 2007, Sean Donelan wrote: Although UltraDNS/Neustar gives month-to-month pricing,

Re: Warning about UltraDNS terms

2007-05-02 Thread Matthew Sullivan
Peter Beckman wrote: Try DNSmadeEasy.com, cheesy name, great service and reliability. Much cheaper, anycasted. Not great for international, but perfect for US. Do use a throw away email address with them though. Regards, Mat

Re: Warning about UltraDNS terms

2007-05-02 Thread Aaron Glenn
On 5/2/07, Peter Beckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try DNSmadeEasy.com, cheesy name, great service and reliability. Much cheaper, anycasted. Not great for international, but perfect for US. Probably because they can't get those fancy OC-256's outside the US...right?*

cisco ios bug...?

2007-05-02 Thread Payam chiachi
Hey Guys, A bit off topic here but I was wondering if anyone else out there has experienced the same thing as I have in regards to a layer3 gig switches from cisco. Ive enabled unicast filtering on all access ports to protect against any mass outbound floods that could possibly saturate the

Re: cisco ios bug...?

2007-05-02 Thread Scott Weeks
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Payam chiachi [EMAIL PROTECTED] : A bit off topic here but I was wondering if anyone else out there has : experienced the same thing as I have in regards to a layer3 gig switches : from cisco. You'll probably have better luck on the cisco-nsp list:

Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing

2007-05-02 Thread Ron da Silva
I see not a lot has changed on egg^H^H^Hnanog. I'll forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to see where that goes (only useful reply). Thanks for the entertainment! :-) -ron - This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary