I'm looking for statistics that may provide hints on the number of IPv4
multihomed sites that exist today. Are there any pointers?
Also, is there a way to find the average number of peers that these sites
multihome with? If not, how large is it in general?
thanks,
watari
On May 15, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Masafumi Watari wrote:
I'm looking for statistics that may provide hints on the number of
IPv4
multihomed sites that exist today. Are there any pointers?
Perhaps start with the number of ASNs?
Also, is there a way to find the average number of peers that
Also, is there a way to find the average number of peers that
these sites
multihome with? If not, how large is it in general?
Difficult to say, and lots of people have tried. Route-Views @
Oregaon, CAIDA, RIPE RIS, and many others has some data you might
be able to morph into that.
Hello all,
We're getting an increasing amount of pressure from VOIP providers
colocated with us and from VOIP end-users to prioritize traffic on our
network. From a network administrator's point of view, I am sensing that
this is the proverbial can of worms, and I'm hesitant to open it. I
I've never done it on a core switch, but at the edge doing traffic
prioritization is dead easy.
I imagine that doing it in the core just means that you need to make
sure your core switch is up to it. For example, Force10 units are
likely to handle it, Extreme units are guaranteed to
I've thought long and hard about this, mostly from the perspective of
regional ILECs too small to implement MPLS.
QoS should be sold in 80k 'channel' increments. You, the carrier,
don't care what the customer is marking as DSCP EF, you just accept and
accelerate the first 80k x number
On May 14, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Donald Stahl wrote:
I'm very happy about the Juniper devices I manage. They're
expensive but
very reliable, and their config interface has lots of unique
features.
Juniper's greatest asset over Cisco is the single software image
for all their systems. In my
