Thus spake "Brandon Butterworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Don't give people an excuse to deagg their /32
RIPE may only give out /32's but ARIN gives out /48's so there wouldn't
be
any deaggregation in that case.
That's not what I said. If /48 are accepted by * then people with
a /32 or whatev
Thus spake "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
small site. so public servers provide multiple and diverse
services. if a hostname has a v6 address, then all services
must be v6 capable because clients do not retry the A record.
This seems to argue for having "service" hostnames, which has been
Thus spake "Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, May 31, 2007, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
In windows, you have IPv6 firewall, so even if Teredo traverses
the "IPv4 security", there is still something there.
A good description of all this is available at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/
The upside is that in the block you're expected to accept /48s, nobody will
have a /32. The downside is that anyone who gets a larger-than-minimum sized
allocation/assignment can deaggregate down to that level.
I don't think ARIN is planning on giving out more less a /48 but more than
a /32-
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/05/isp_privacy
Pretty useless reporting, especially since the reporter apparently didn't
even do even a little Google research to discover which ISP's (not the
ones he queried) were "partners" wi
On May 31, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Donald Stahl wrote:
The upside is that in the block you're expected to accept /48s,
nobody will have a /32. The downside is that anyone who gets a
larger-than-minimum sized allocation/assignment can deaggregate
down to that level.
I don't think ARIN is plann
Thus spake "Donald Stahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The upside is that in the block you're expected to accept /48s,
nobody will have a /32. The downside is that anyone who gets
a larger-than-minimum sized allocation/assignment can
deaggregate down to that level.
I don't think ARIN is planning on gi
I don't think ARIN is planning on giving out more less a /48 but more than
a /32- at least that was the impression I got. End sites get a /48- ISP's
get a /32 or larger- and that's it (I could certainly be wrong). As such,
deaggragation in the /48 block should not be an issue because no one wi
Current policy allows for greater-than-/48 PI assignments if the org can
justify it. However, since we haven't told staff (via policy) what that
justification should look like, they are currently approving all requests and
several orgs have taken advantage of that.
I can't imagine what an end
Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
self-guided)? Looking to send several 1st and 2nd tier guys, for some
platform/vendor-agnostic training.
Any clues?
Thanks..
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET
Donald Stahl wrote:
> As for the deaggregation- anyone deaggregating a /40 into 256 routes
> should have there AS permanently blackholed :)
I think you omitted an "S" there, Donald :-)
Jeff
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
self-guided)? Looking to send several 1st and 2nd tier guys, for some
platform/vendor-agnostic training.
Internet2 people have been running workshops on multicast and IPv6
separate
There are a few books out there that will give mention of IPv6
configurations, but most are vendor-specific as far as I have seen.
Cisco and Juniper both have at least modules (if not full courses) on IPv6.
Each is obviously not vendor-agnostic. Something could always be customized
to cover what
I got a pretty good look at it (at least it seemed like it to me) back
when I got my CCNP. The Cisco books are pretty good.
On 5/31/07, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are a few books out there that will give mention of IPv6
configurations, but most are vendor-specific as far as
On 31-mei-2007, at 15:45, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
The general rule, for both v4 and v6, is that people should filter
on whatever the minimum allocation/assignment size for each RIR block.
Did someone take the trouble to tell RIPE that?
193/8 /29
194/7 /29
That allows for 6291456 pref
Thus spake "Donald Stahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Current policy allows for greater-than-/48 PI assignments if the
org can justify it. However, since we haven't told staff (via
policy) what that justification should look like, they are currently
approving all requests and several orgs have taken ad
On 31-mei-2007, at 18:32, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
self-guided)? Looking to send several 1st and 2nd tier guys, for some
platform/vendor-agnostic training.
You'll want to be more specific: IPv6 impacts a lot of stuff, and few
> In perfect time, this was published yesterday, to answer that very
> question:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoagland-v6ops-
> teredosecconcerns-00.txt
Unfortunately, he doesn't say much in the way of solutions. For
instance, if a company has internal IPv6 connectivity to their IS
First of all, there's disagreement about the definition of "site", and some
folks hold the opinion that means physical location. Thus, if you have 100
sites, those folks would claim you have justified 100 /48s (or one /41).
Other folks, like me, disagree with that, but there are orgs out ther
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>
> Thus spake "Donald Stahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Current policy allows for greater-than-/48 PI assignments if the
>>> org can justify it. However, since we haven't told staff (via
>>> policy) what that justification should look like, they are currently
>>> approving all
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:34:44PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> about to run out of ip space. a half-assed design was released. the
> press stopped screaming. victory was declared, everyone went home.
Actually, they didn't go home. Victory, "they" think, is never having
to go home (but IETF Dall
On Thu, 31 May 2007, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
self-guided)? Looking to send several 1st and 2nd tier guys, for some
platform/vendor-agnostic training.
Internet2 people h
Thus spake "Stephen Sprunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Someone recently posted a link (either on PPML or here -- I can't find it
now) that showed ARIN's minima for the various v4 and v6 blocks. The v4
ones were all over the map, but there are relatively few v6 blocks and all
of them are /32 except f
On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:40:42 BST, Jeroen Massar said:
> When you have a large company, the company is also split over several
> administrative sites, in some cases you might have a single
> administrative group covering several sites though, this allows you to
> provide them with a single /48 as t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:40:42 BST, Jeroen Massar said:
>
>> When you have a large company, the company is also split over several
>> administrative sites, in some cases you might have a single
>> administrative group covering several sites though, this allows you to
>> pr
You can also try Command Information [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
Sunset Learning
https://www.coursemax.com/sunset/CourseSchedule.aspx?CourseID=355ef422-32d3-
4379-a950-2087f6b13bcc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Lucy Lynch
> Sent: Thu
Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
# traceroute6 www.nanog.org
traceroute6: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
That would be a start... It took years to get the IETF to eat its own
dog food, though.
i suspect the merit/nanog folks invol
On 1/06/2007, at 4:32 AM, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
self-guided)? Looking to send several 1st and 2nd tier guys, for some
platform/vendor-agnostic training.
Any clues?
If you want books, http://safari.oreilly.com/.
My collea
Donald Stahl writes:
>> I guess we have different definitions for "most significant
>> backbones". Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running
>> _somewhere_, say, for instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or
>> something. Which is not particularly useful if we are talking about
>> a "s
Alex Rubenstein writes:
> Does anyone know of any good IPv6 training resources (classroom, or
> self-guided)?
If your router vendor supports IPv6 (surprisingly, many do!):
lab-router#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
lab-router(config)#ipv6 ?
access-list
Thus spake "Jeroen Massar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
First of all, there's disagreement about the definition of "site",
The general definition of a site that I find appropriate is and
works pretty well as a rule of thumb:
"A site is defined by it having a single administrativ
31 matches
Mail list logo
