On (2007-06-23 08:22 -1000), Randy Bush wrote:
> for those wishing historical perspective on route flap damping, document
> ripe-378 (may 2006) says
> i.e., it's time to turn it off. you are damaging your customers and
> others' customers.
I've always thought that damping as an idea is a goo
Leo Bicknell writes:
> However, if you put 15G down your "20G" path, you have no
> redundancy. In a cut, dropping 5G on the floor, causing 33% packet
> loss is not "up", it might as well be down.
Sorry, it doesn't work like that either. 33% packet loss is an upper
limit, but not what you'd see
Sean Donelan wrote:
> Is paying for "protected circuits" actually worth it. Or are you better
> off just buying two circuits and using both during normal conditions.
> Use switching at layer 3 to the remaining circuit during abnormal
> conditions. Most of the time, you get twice the capacity for
Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Sorry, it doesn't work like that. I do happen to believe rather
> than get a single SONET/WDM protected 10G Wave you are better off
> getting two unprotected 10G waves and plugging them into your
> devices, and let layer 3 routing take over. It generally saves a
> good bit
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Robert Blayzor wrote:
>
> > However, if you put 15G down your "20G" path, you have no redundancy.
> > In a cut, dropping 5G on the floor, causing 33% packet loss is not
> > "up", it might as well be down.
>
> I don't know if that's always true. Case in point 802.17. It run
Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> Then there's the interesting: "How do you classify 'to be dropped'
> traffic?" Simon suggests nntp or BitTorrent could be put into a lower
> class queue, I'm curious as to how you'd classify traffic which is
> port-agile such as BitTorrent though. In theory that sounds lik
On 24-jun-2007, at 14:32, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I do happen to believe rather
than get a single SONET/WDM protected 10G Wave you are better off
getting two unprotected 10G waves and plugging them into your
devices, and let layer 3 routing take over.
That really depends. Two unprotected circ
I think we should now wind up the discussion on transoceanic bandwidth
and extend our thoughts and prayers to the family in this time of
need.
From CNN:
Beck was discovered by police officers responding to a call to his
home in suburban Phoenix, police department spokesman Andy Hill said
Sund
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Robert Blayzor wrote:
>
> Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> > Then there's the interesting: "How do you classify 'to be dropped'
> > traffic?" Simon suggests nntp or BitTorrent could be put into a lower
> > class queue, I'm curious as to how you'd classify traffic which is
> > port-
http://www.thanhniennews.com/society/?catid=3&newsid=29347
Police arrested two more people Saturday for stealing undersea fiber-optic
cables off the southern coast of Vietnam, including the group.s suspected
leader. Ten have been apprehended in the case so far.
[...]
Eleven kilometers of th
But Paul,
I live in Paris and I detect no signs of rigor mortis as I write this email.
However, if you still have not figured out which cable is severed across
the Atlantic, check the Global Crossing latency, may be that will give you
a clue ...
Cordialement,
Roderick.
>
> I think we should no
11 matches
Mail list logo
