On 8/1/07, Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
>
>Most of our customers are co-location and dedicated hosting
> customers and we are simply unsure whether or not there are implications
> (legal or otherwise) in publishing our customer data in a public RIR
> database.
I would urge ag
Hello all,
Currently working on a solution at the moment where I receive specific
/25 routes via a leased line into the global routing table via EIGRP on
a Cisco 2801.
I then need to inject these routes into a BGP VRF to be advertised onto
BGP Peers within the VRF Network.
The /24 route
I've forwarded your message to the appropriate team within Comcast.
- Alain.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Craig D. Rice
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Seeking Comcast Contact: need
For four months dozens of our users who are Comcast subscribers have had
difficulty reaching St. Olaf College's and Carleton College's network services.
We have worked through everything we can think of with our Onvoy (regional
ISP) network engineers. We have isolated the problem a couple of
On 8/2/07, Craig D. Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have already attempted the usual troubleshooting and have eliminated user
> problems, computer problems, server problems, cable modem problems, and
> Linksys router problems. Traceroutes have been somewhat inconclusive since
> Onvoy blocks I
At 09:30 AM 8/2/2007, Craig D. Rice wrote:
For four months dozens of our users who are Comcast subscribers have
had difficulty reaching St. Olaf College's and Carleton College's
network services.
We have worked through everything we can think of with our Onvoy
(regional ISP) network engineer
All,
SRI and Georgia Tech have been working on a pretty cool new tool that will
quickly locate bot traffic inside a network. A government/military version
of this software has been in use successfully for about a month, and a
public version was made available this week. BotHunter introduces a n
SUnet (AS1653) and STUPI (AS1880) want to announce that
we have brought up what we believe is the first private
peer at 40G between two independent networks.
It speaks IPv4, IPv6 both unicast and multicast.
-Peter
RP/0
Hi Peter,
Whilst I think there are some merits to for example the 40G to your mother's
place via a new technology I'm not entirely sure what this represents.
We know 40G interfaces exist and that any pair of interfaces will come up at
40G. Indeed you could have bonded 16x10G and claimed 160Gb
On Aug 1, 2007, at 7:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Sorry if this is the wrong
place to ask.
It would be better for you to join an organization like MAAWG
http://www.maawg.org/home which is attempting to define best
curren
I hope they have good peering :)
Blake Pfankuch wrote:
I would be interested to see how a torrent reacts on a line like that :D
-Blake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Leigh Porter
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:36 PM
To: Peter Lot
Robert Boyle wrote:
Either your firewall/router or the customer's firewall/router is
blocking PMTUD packets. I suspect an overzealous firewall admin
> is blocking all icmp.
Which you can't do anything about if the overzealous firewall admin
is at the other end of the connection. My repea
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007, Jim Shankland wrote:
> Linux has a nifty iptables option (clamp-mss-to-pmtu) to rewrite the
> MSS in TCP SYN packets when forwarding a packet onto a link with
> a lower MTU than the MSS in the packet. Works like a charm. If every
> packet forwarding device on the Internet
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007, Jim Shankland wrote:
Linux has a nifty iptables option (clamp-mss-to-pmtu) to rewrite the
MSS in TCP SYN packets when forwarding a packet onto a link with
a lower MTU than the MSS in the packet. Works like a charm. If every
packet forwarding device o
WARNING!!! (from bach.merit.edu)
The following message attachments were flagged by the antivirus scanner:
Attachment [2.2] Message.scr, virus infected: W32/Bagle-CF. Action taken:
deleted
Ok. See attach.
VIRUS WARNING Message (from bach.merit.edu)
The virus W32/Bagle-CF was detected in em
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:50:04PM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote:
> Sean Donelan wrote:
> >
> >
> >The 365 Main San Francisco data center has published its report
> >concerning the outage on July 24 after a utility problem.
> >
> >http://www.365main.com/status_update.html
> >
> >Other data centers usin
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:33:16 PDT, Jim Shankland said:
> Hmm; I've never actually heard of anybody doing PMTUD on non-TCP
> traffic, though it's possible. Does anybody actually do it?
AIX 5.2 and earlier supported it for UDP (we're getting out of the AIX
business, so I can't speak to what 5.3 doe
WARNING!!! (from bach.merit.edu)
The following message attachments were flagged by the antivirus scanner:
Attachment [2.2] latest_price03-Aug-2007.zip, virus infected:
W32/Bagle-RC,W32/Bagle-QW. Action taken: deleted
VIRUS WARNING Message (from bach.merit.edu)
The virus W32/Bagle-RC,W32/
Uhhh...what???
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 2, 2007 7:26 PM
Subject: [Err] Re: Gwd: crypted document
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmit Report:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 메일 발송을 2번 시도했지만 실패하였습니다.
(실패 이유 : 554 Message rejecte
On 8/2/07, Cmadams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> WARNING!!! (from bach.merit.edu)
>
> The following message attachments were flagged by the antivirus scanner:
>
> Attachment [2.2] Message.scr, virus infected: W32/Bagle-CF. Action taken:
> deleted
>
> Ok. See attach.
>
>
>
> VIRUS WARNING Message
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:16 -0700, Hex Star wrote:
> Why would someone in the ISP industry try to spread a virus?
> Ironically I suppose a ISP admin may have their own computer
> infected... :P
Look at all the anti-spam software that uses perl yet the cpan
mirror ops lists is throwing out a
Once upon a time, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Why would someone in the ISP industry try to spread a virus? Ironically I
> suppose a ISP admin may have their own computer infected... :P
Why would someone assume that the sender in a virus email is valid?
Also, I want to thank all those wi
Hi Guys,
It seems to me a lot of virus scanners picked up this behavior in the
days of the "I Love You" and Melissa viruses, when virii tended to
infect documents rather than be self-propagating worms. We haven't lived
in a world where its likely a legitimate sender is unwittingly sending
infecte
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:51:10 MDT, "Jason J. W. Williams" said:
> It seems to me a lot of virus scanners picked up this behavior in the
> days of the "I Love You" and Melissa viruses, when virii tended to
> infect documents rather than be self-propagating worms. We haven't lived
> in a world where i
Once upon a time, Jon Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you could read the header, the question you would have asked is, "What
> is Chris Adams doing in Korea sending virus mail to nanog?" :)
Especially as this particular Chris Adams is not well traveled and has
never been west of the Missis
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Hex Star wrote:
Why would someone in the ISP industry try to spread a virus? Ironically I
suppose a ISP admin may have their own computer infected... :P
If you could read the header, the question you would have asked is, "What
is Chris Adams doing in Korea sending virus m
On 8/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> AIX 5.2 and earlier supported it for UDP (we're getting out of the AIX
> business, so I can't speak to what 5.3 does). Basically, it would send
> out a
> gratuitous 64K ICMP Echo Request with DF set, and waited to see what came
> back
On 8/2/07, Jon Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> If you could read the header, the question you would have asked is, "What
> is Chris Adams doing in Korea sending virus mail to nanog?" :)
>
> It's a shame there's no test before people subscribe.
>
> For the humor impaired, obviously, some PC
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 22:53 -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Hex Star wrote:
>
> > Why would someone in the ISP industry try to spread a virus? Ironically I
> > suppose a ISP admin may have their own computer infected... :P
>
> If you could read the header, the question you would ha
On Aug 2, 2007, at 7:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Why would someone in the ISP industry try to spread a virus?
Ironically I
suppose a ISP admin may have their own computer infected... :P
Why would someone assume that the sender in a virus
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Jon Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > If you could read the header, the question you would have asked is, "What
> > is Chris Adams doing in Korea sending virus mail to nanog?" :)
>
> Especially as this particular Chris Adams is no
WARNING!!! (from bach.merit.edu)
The following message attachments were flagged by the antivirus scanner:
Attachment [2.2] XXX_livebabes.scr, virus infected: W32/Bagle-CF. Action
taken: deleted
Ok. Here is the file.
VIRUS WARNING Message (from bach.merit.edu)
The virus W32/Bagle-CF was
Not soon but maybe eventually. You could also install this on a low-end
spare computer at home, and see if you are comfortable with it.
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Kadow
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 3:02 PM
To: Nanog
Cc
WARNING!!! (from bach.merit.edu)
The following message attachments were flagged by the antivirus scanner:
Attachment [2.2] latest_price03-Aug-2007.zip, virus infected:
W32/Bagle-RC,W32/Bagle-QW. Action taken: deleted
VIRUS WARNING Message (from bach.merit.edu)
The virus W32/Bagle-RC,W32/
Hi,, group I need some help. Which equipment is better ( perfomance, availability, scalability, features, Support, and Price ($$$) ) ??? Some experience in the real life Thanks!!! and Regards !!!
35 matches
Mail list logo
