John Osmon wrote:
Is anyone out there setting up routing boundaries differently for
IPv4 and IPv6? I'm setting up a network where it seems to make
sense to route IPv4, while bridging IPv6 -- but I can be talked
out of it rather easily.
Years ago, I worked on a academic network where we had a
I agree with this, and many people take the Ts Cs, MSA, etc the vendor
anyway. We have a standing habit of reading over our new contracts with
our attorney on a con call, we always edit them, send them back to the
vendor and negotiate on any changes. Its amazing how much you can get
anyone have a phone contact number for equinix ashburn dc2? i am in
tokyo and a box in dc2 needs an attitude adjustment. thanks.
randy
thanks! verio noc beat you to it. but thanks!
randy
My understanding is that there are no known algorithms for fast
updates (and particularly withdrawals) on aggregated FIBs, especially
if those FIBs are stored in CIDR form. This is the prime reason why
all those Cisco 65xx/76xx with MSFC2/PFC2 will be worthless junk in a
couple of months.
Do
Jason LeBlanc wrote:
I agree with this, and many people take the Ts Cs, MSA, etc the vendor
anyway. We have a standing habit of reading over our new contracts with
our attorney on a con call, we always edit them, send them back to the
vendor and negotiate on any changes. Its amazing
Just for the record about DECNet:
At the peak of population, I managed naming and addressing
assignments for a DECNet network with just over 8000 nodes. Local
routers were mostly Digital Equipment, some wide area used
Cisco. After a major split in the network, the remaining 3500 or so
Phase
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:56:29 -0600
From: John Osmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone out there setting up routing boundaries differently for
IPv4 and IPv6? I'm setting up a network where it seems to make
sense to route IPv4, while bridging IPv6 -- but I can be
