Ok, I could have picked a better title. I'm looking for a
pointer to a box (pref. an embedded platform of some kind)
that will receive/accept SNMP traps and sound a real world
alarm/siren/klaxon. It can do fancy things like logging and
such, but not strictly required.
The Google keyword
I've been having a very hard time getting a simple question answered
from your postmaster tech support, please hit me off-list.
Thanks,
-Drew
Anyone else seeing congestion / high latency between New York and Ashburn on
Teleglobe ? We've been seeing an extra 50-80ms of latency between the two
on and off throughout the day...
7. 216.140.15.158
1.1% 34.1 40.0 33.9 143.4 19.3
G1-1.rp0.chcg.broadwing.net
216.140.14.110
On 8/27/07, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
an MSFC2 can
hold 256,000 entries in its FIB of which 12,000 are reserved for
Multicast. I do not know if the 12,000 can be set to serve the general
purpose.
The MSFC2 therefore can server 244,000 routes without uRPF turned on.
I'm hit
Hello,
I think I posted about this yesterday. Their 'support' got back to me
today with:
Thank you for Contacting MSN Hotmail Domain Support. Unfortunately we
won't be abl;e to provide you with spam samples
I assumed this as a canned response. Then I noticed the abl;e. I would
really
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:11:52 -0400
William Herrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/27/07, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
an MSFC2 can
hold 256,000 entries in its FIB of which 12,000 are reserved for
Multicast. I do not know if the 12,000 can be set to serve the general
purpose.
While I don't work in Hotmail, I usually suggest people start here:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/gillum.html
Regards,
Christian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond L. Corbin
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:52 PM
To: Drew Weaver; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE:
Bill,
[...]
2. Once the limit is reached, excess routes will fail over to software
switching. TAC did not specify how routes are designated as excess.
I'm not sure if the Sup2's handle this case differently from the
Sup720s we were using, but, in our case, when we reached the ceilign
the
[...]
2. Once the limit is reached, excess routes will fail over to software
switching. TAC did not specify how routes are designated as excess.
most-specific-prefixes first. it has to be this way due to the way a TCAM
search works.
I'm not sure if the Sup2's handle this case differently
Unless you offer a substantial sum of cash I wouldn't expect any quality
support...
- John
agree that this isn't ideal, however Cisco has always been very specific
about the h/w FIB adjacency table sizes on the hardware in question.
i know that vendor bashing is a sport in this list, but
Can you please point out where I can find this information ...
The only place I found
agree that this isn't ideal, however Cisco has always been very specific
about the h/w FIB adjacency table sizes on the hardware in question.
i know that vendor bashing is a sport in this list, but
Can you please point out where I can find this information ...
The Sup720 datasheet
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Lincoln Dale wrote:
reason i ask is that since circa. 12.2(18)SXF9 (i.e. back in 2005), there has
One of the problems with this is that the people that have the tendency of
not knowing their hardware limitations are the same people that will be
running SXD because they
13 matches
Mail list logo
