On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 09:37:46PM -0400, John Curran wrote:
>
> At 9:21 PM -0400 9/3/07, Joe Abley wrote:
> >
> >Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be replaced, and
> >believe it can be replaced?
>
> Just imagine *that* switchover, with the same level of
> transition pl
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be
replaced, and believe it can be replaced?
Or is the motivation for replacing TCP mainly felt by those who spend
a lot of time trying to get maximum performance out of single flows
over hi
At 7:40 PM -0700 9/3/07, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>John Curran wrote:
>> At 9:21 PM -0400 9/3/07, Joe Abley wrote:
>>> Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be replaced, and
>>> believe it can be replaced?
>>
>> Just imagine *that* switchover, with the same level of
>> transition
John Curran wrote:
> At 9:21 PM -0400 9/3/07, Joe Abley wrote:
>> Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be replaced, and
>> believe it can be replaced?
>
> Just imagine *that* switchover, with the same level of
> transition planning as we received with IPv6...
> ;-)
The con
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 21:21:26 -0400
Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 3-Sep-2007, at 1328, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Spurred on by a widespread belief that TCP is showing its age and >
> > needs replacing
>
> I don't mean to hijack this thread unnecessarily, but this seems like
At 9:21 PM -0400 9/3/07, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be replaced, and
>believe it can be replaced?
Just imagine *that* switchover, with the same level of
transition planning as we received with IPv6...
;-)
/John
On 3-Sep-2007, at 1328, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spurred on by a widespread belief that TCP is showing its age and
needs replacing
I don't mean to hijack this thread unnecessarily, but this seems like
an interesting disconnect between ops people and research people
(either that or I'm j
Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos
We would like to invite you to a two-day congestion control workshop,
titled "Train-wrecks and congestion control: What happens if we do
nothing?", which we are hosting at Stanford on 31 March - 1 April, 2008.
Spurred on
