On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Sean Donelan wrote:
Why artificially keep access link speeds low just to prevent upstream
network congestion? Why can't you have big access links?
You're the one that says that statistical overbooking doesn't work, not
anyone else.
Since I know people that offer
On 26 okt 2007, at 18:29, Sean Donelan wrote:
And generating packets with false address information is more
acceptable? I don't buy it.
When a network is congested, someone is going to be upset about any
possible response.
That doesn't mean all possible responses are equally acceptable.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Why artificially keep access link speeds low just to prevent upstream
network congestion? Why can't you have big access links?
You're the one that says that statistical overbooking doesn't work, not
anyone else.
If you performed a simple
Background:
We MX for a domain, and turn it right around
to Yahoo! Mail. I know others have run into this
before. Because a fair amount of it is spam,
Yahoo stops accepting the mail, yadda yadda yadda.
Problem:
I jumped through all the hoops, and they
tell me I'm denied. When
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Sean Donelan wrote:
If you performed a simple Google search, you would have discovered many
universities around the world having similar problems.
The university network engineers are saying adding capacity alone isn't
solving their problems.
You're welcome to provide
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
If you performed a simple Google search, you would have discovered many
universities around the world having similar problems.
The university network engineers are saying adding capacity alone isn't
solving their problems.
You're welcome to
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with
specific information other than to suggest a review
of the questionnaire we supplied and try to determine
where your mailing practices may be improved upon.
In other words, fix your
