This report has been generated at Fri Nov 16 21:17:23 2007 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 15-Oct-07 -to- 15-Nov-07 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS8452 236412 2.8% 731.9 -- TEDATA TEDATA
2 - AS16637 176594 2.1%2487.2 --
Is there a mailing list similar to NANOG specifically for e-mail
operations? I've seen some smaller lists around that deal with specific
issues (spam, etc.) but have not seen a general postmaster operations
mailing list, though I'm sure there has to be one around somewhere. Any
hints in that
On Nov 16, 2007 10:04 PM, Leigh Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there was, I sure would not join it. It'd be full of I cannot send
mail to your domain blah blah
Been to a MAAWG meeting yet? Or been on one such list?
There's a lot more interesting and useful / operationally relevant
Dear Colleagues:
This morning, a new Acceptable Use Policy was posted on the NANOG website.
http://www.nanog.org/aup.html
Please be aware of it and note some significant changes. Much of the
language like discouraged was removed so that readers of the list
can interpret the AUP clearly vs.
If there was, I sure would not join it. It'd be full of I cannot send
mail to your domain blah blah
--
Leigh
Justin Scott wrote:
Is there a mailing list similar to NANOG specifically for e-mail
operations? I've seen some smaller lists around that deal with specific
issues (spam, etc.) but
On Nov 16, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 10:04 PM, Leigh Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there was, I sure would not join it. It'd be full of I cannot
send
mail to your domain blah blah
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 10:04 PM, Leigh Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there was, I sure would not join it. It'd be full of I cannot send
mail to your domain blah blah
Been to a MAAWG meeting yet? Or been on one such
--On November 13, 2007 3:07:03 PM -0500 Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Proposed new FCC rules for backup power sources for central offices, cell
sites, remote switches, digital loops, etc. For the first time, the FCC
is considering specific backup power time requirements of 24
