Here a summary of the answers I got. Again thanks for your help.
mail from Joe
-Try fprobe, open source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/fprobe
reply from Samuel
-nProbe by ntop.org is pretty robust tool for generating v5/v9 flows and
fairly inexpensive. http://www.ntop.org/nProbe.html
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:14:33PM -0600,
David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 61 lines which said:
To try to make this slightly more relevant, is it a good idea,
either technically or legally, to mandate some sort of standard for
this? I'm thinking something like the
On Jan 16, 2008 5:39 PM, Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. UK: UKNOF; http://www.uknof.org.uk/ I just attended the last meeting
Monday. Free and a good lunch included!
Please do not confuse UKNOF with the United Kingdom Nitric Oxide Forum.
Nitric Oxide keeps your arteries relaxed and
Hi Folks,
1. UK: UKNOF; http://www.uknof.org.uk/ I just attended the last meeting Monday.
Free and a good lunch included!
Please do not confuse UKNOF with the United Kingdom Nitric Oxide Forum. Nitric
Oxide keeps your arteries relaxed and your blood pressure under control
2. Europe: RIPE;
On Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:09:48PM -, Rod Beck wrote:
6. I am not aware of any Dutch per se ISP conferences although that market is
certainly quite vibrant. I am also disappointed to see the Canadians and
Irish have next to nothing despite Ireland being the European base of
operations for
Rod Beck wrote:
[..]
6. I am not aware of any Dutch per se ISP conferences although that
market is certainly quite vibrant.
See http://www.nlnog.net/ though conferences is not the case, then
again there is RIPE + AMS-IX meetings, who needs more than that :)
Also see http://www.swinog.org
Suresh Ramasubramanian schrieb:
APRICOT - http://www.apricot2008.net next month in Taipei.
SANOG - www.sanog.org - going on right now in Dhaka, Bangladesh
SwiNOG - http://www.swinog.ch/ - two meetings per year in Berne,
Switzerland, active mailing list, IRC and regional beer events.
Regards,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:09:48PM -, Rod Beck wrote:
6. I am not aware of any Dutch per se ISP conferences although that market is
certainly quite vibrant. I am also disappointed to see the Canadians and
Irish have next to nothing despite Ireland
Rod Beck (Rod.Beck) writes:
Hi Folks,
AfNOG, African Network Operators Group. Will be on its 9th year this
year in Rabat, Marocco. It takes place back-to-back with the AFRINIC
meeting:
http://www.afnog.org/afnog2008/announce.html
Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzmeyer) writes:
that appears on most packaged foods in the States, that ISPs put on
their Web sites and advertisements. I'm willing to disclose that we
block certain ports [...]
As a consumer, I would say YES. And FCC should mandates it.
... and if the
AusNOG - The Australian Network Operator Group - http://www.ausnog.net/
- Had its first meeting Nov 15-16 2007 - http://2007.ausnog.net/
NZNog - The New Zealand Operator Group - http://www.nznog.org/
- 2008 Conference will be held in a couple of week - http://2008.nznog.org/
From: [EMAIL
Rod Beck (Rod.Beck) writes:
3. France: FRnOG; http://www.frnog.org/ Has several meetings each year. Has
interesting discussions in French on its mailing list. Moderator makes Stalin
look easy going.
sarcasmInteresting point of view, I'm sure it's impartial./sarcasm
Note
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Phil Regnauld wrote:
[snip]
Also missed Middle East Network Operators Group (MENOG):
http://www.menog.net/
Better still would be some links to aggregate lists:
- http://www.nanog.org/orgs.html
- http://www.bugest.net/nogs.html
-
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:09:48 -
Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6. I am not aware of any Dutch per se ISP conferences although that
market is certainly quite vibrant. I am also disappointed to see the
Canadians and Irish have next to nothing despite Ireland being the
European base of
.. and could someone or other update the wiki with this info?
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Other_Operations_Groups
I added a couple.
Adrian
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Rod Beck wrote:
Hi Folks,
1. UK: UKNOF; http://www.uknof.org.uk/ I just attended the last meeting
Monday. Free and a
The wikipedia article is simplified to the extent that it doesn't embed
actual practices. Those are best obtained at SCTE meetings and discussion
with CMTS vendors.
A 10x oversubscription rate from residential broadband access doesn't seem
too unreasonable to me based in practice and what I've
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:09:48 -
Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6. I am not aware of any Dutch per se ISP conferences although that
market is certainly quite vibrant. I am also disappointed to see the
Canadians and Irish have next to nothing despite Ireland being the
European base of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Greco) writes:
...
So, anyways, would it be entertaining to discuss the relative merits of
various DNS implementations that attempt to provide geographic answers
to requests, versus doing it at a higher level? (I can hear everyone
groaning now, and some purist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Greco) writes:
...
So, anyways, would it be entertaining to discuss the relative merits of
various DNS implementations that attempt to provide geographic answers
to requests, versus doing it at a higher level? (I can hear everyone
groaning now, and some purist
Props to Jeff Chan who I saw it from.
Yes, I still believe these ISP distributed machines called broadband
routers are a network operators issue. But not all may agree on that.
--
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20080116/tc_pcworld/141399
Flash Attack Could Take Over Your Router
Robert
Swinog in switzerland is a great forum.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Gallagher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 January 2008 14:46
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:09:48 -
Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6. I am not aware
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
[...]
If you're doing things on the Internet, instead of the physical world,
topological distance is presumably of much greater interest than whatever
geographic proximity may coincidentally
Hi. I'm by no means an ip/networking expert, and we're having some
difficulty communicating with the boffins at ATT. Any
input/advice/translation would be appreciated.
We own our own class C netblock. Our previous provider, Sprint, had no
problem adding it to their network/advertising it
If you want connectivity from both ATT and Sprint with your one block,
you have plenty of justification from ARIN to get your AS assigned
assuming both feeds come into one location.
However, it looks like you are asking two providers to announce the same
block at two different locations
On Jan 16, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Mike Donahue wrote:
Hi. I'm by no means an ip/networking expert, and we're having some
difficulty communicating with the boffins at ATT. Any
input/advice/translation would be appreciated.
We own our own class C netblock. Our previous provider, Sprint, had
no
On Jan 16, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
If you want connectivity from both ATT and Sprint with your one
block,
you have plenty of justification from ARIN to get your AS assigned
assuming both feeds come into one location.
However, it looks like you are asking two providers to
Mike,
Generally a netblock is homed somewhere if it doesn't have an
association with an ASN. These will often be listed as non-portable,
and then each ISP would have to choose to allow you to use that netblock
on its network or not.
Based on your company name and domain I
Darryl Dunkin wrote:
If you want connectivity from both ATT and Sprint with your one block,
you have plenty of justification from ARIN to get your AS assigned
assuming both feeds come into one location.
However, it looks like you are asking two providers to announce the same
block at two
His Sprint circuit has been disconnected and he only has the ATT circuit,
which comes into his cabinet, inside of ATTs Colo facility.
ATT does not want to announce the space without doing an eBGP peer with you
because they do not own the space. This is their policy, Sprint might not
have the
Some networks (of note, the larger ones) have registered a customer
ASN. The idea is that networks advertised from their backbone ASN
should only be the ones they own, and all customers who have no ASN
use the customer ASN to originate their block. In most cases the
contract prohibits using the
Hi,
JANOG, Japan Networks Operators' Group(http://www.janog.gr.jp/) discuss
on mailing list in japanese, and has meetings twice a year.
We will hold 21st meeting next week(2008/01/24-2008/01/25)
in Kumamoto city, Japan.
--
Masaru MUKAI / JANOG
From: Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Mike Donahue wrote:
Hi. I'm by no means an ip/networking expert, and we're having some
difficulty communicating with the boffins at ATT. Any
input/advice/translation would be appreciated.
We own our own class C netblock. Our previous provider, Sprint, had no
problem adding it to their
...and aggregated calendars:
- http://www.icann.org/general/calendar/
- http://www.isoc.org/isoc/conferences/events/
I've been maintaining an integrated calendar across our related
meetings for awhile now. For folks using iCal or compatible tools,
you can subscribe via the webcal link
On Jan 16, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Mike Donahue wrote:
Anyway, it's all getting (for us) pretty complicated. We're a fairly
small firm and just want an Ethernet handoff with our IP block on it.
Sprint didn't blink at the request, but ATT... We're getting a good
rate from ATT for the IP services
the folk who actually schedule the meetings use
http://ws.edu.isoc.org/calendar/
note that this is not the normal isoc calendar, rather one they kindly
host for the ops meeting committees.
but few of the national nogs we have seen mentioned here use it.
and it did not prevent nanog
Once again shortly after posting a message to NANOG a fairly
significant dictionary attack using Earthlink's mail servers fired up.
The same thing happened around Nov 30th (I posted about it here.)
Does this happen to anyone else posting here? It's pretty clearly a
lame attempt to intimidate
Does this happen to anyone else posting here?
not that i have noticed. i do see massively ( 5x) more ssh dict
attacks on the hosts i have in tokyo than those on other continents.
but the sample size is too small to draw any serious conclusions. but i
would guess there are folk who
37 matches
Mail list logo
