> In the case the german regulator is dealing with the ip
> address is not be considered exclusive of the rest of a data
> set. The question is given a commercially valuable dataset
> which contains ip addresses what is sufficient to anonymize
> the users while maintaining the value of the d
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:33:20 PST, Owen DeLong said:
And oddly enough, license plates on cars act *exactly the same way* - but
nobody seems at all surprised when police can work backwards from a plate
and come up with a suspect (who, admittedly, ma
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
>> because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
>> RRs.
>
> it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
> problem.
Why don't you ju
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hank
Nussbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I wouldn't be suprised if in a few years some EU/US law mandates IP
number portability, just like people have with their cellphones.
I doubt it. The portability of Internet Addressing arises from the use
of DNS.
You
Hank Nussbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't be suprised if in a few years some EU/US law mandates IP number
> portability, just like people have with their cellphones. Imagine what
> that will do to the routing tables. How many /32s can we get into the
> RIBs these days? :-)
Th
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:33:20 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> >>>And oddly enough, license plates on cars act *exactly the same way* - but
> >>>nobody seems at all surprised when police can
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
So - if you can work backwards from license plate info, telephone numbers,
and IP addresses, and get a good idea of who the person is, and there's
general agreement that the first two are "personal information" that allows
(at least specu
BGP Update Report
Interval: 24-Dec-07 -to- 24-Jan-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS17421 419590 5.6% 10489.8 -- EMOME-TW Long Distance & Mobile
Business Group,
2 - AS3462
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Palmer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Tunnels all over the place seems like the only way it'd even be halfway
practical. It's more-or-less how phone number portability works anyway,
from what (little) I know.
I don't know about the USA, but in the UK it's don
On Fri, January 25, 2008 6:33 am, Owen DeLong wrote:
> In order to be using the license plate, you had to be physically present
> in the car.
Or in any car displaying the same identifier.
> In order to be on the telephone number, you (almost always) need to be
> present at the site where that p
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 25 21:15:38 2008 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Bjørn Mork wrote:
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
RRs.
it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
problem.
Why don't
On 25 Jan 2008, at 10:42, Roland Perry wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
Tunnels all over the place seems like the only way it'd even be
halfway practical. It's more-or-less how phone number portability
works anyway, from what (little) I know.
I
Folks, we'd like to ask that this thread die a quick and painful
death. It's gone off topic and it seems to have run whatever short
course that it tried. While what Europe does is interesting to us as
network operators, this is European policy and off topic for NANOG.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannig
Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
RRs.
it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
problem.
Why don't you just put your DNS servers in some other TLD and forget
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy
Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Tunnels all over the place seems like the only way it'd even be
halfway practical. It's more-or-less how phone number portability
works anyway, from what (little) I know.
I don't know about the USA, but in the UK it's d
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:42:44AM +,
Roland Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
> in the UK it [phone number portability] 's done with something
> similar to DNS. The telephone system looks up the first N digits of
> the number to determine the operator it wa
>Why don't you just put your DNS servers in some other TLD and forget
>about the problems of adding glue records to .net/.com? The name
>of your DNS server can't really be that important.
Because it would mean changing the nameservers for $stupid amounts of customer
domains
for which we are
On Jan 25, 2008, at 6:05 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:42:44AM +,
Roland Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
in the UK it [phone number portability] 's done with something
similar to DNS. The telephone system looks up the first N
I don't know about your IP addresses, but, people can use my IP
addresses
from a number of locations which are nowhere near the jurisdiction in
which my network operates, so, I don't really see the correlation
here
with license plates or phone numbers.
I'm not clear if you mean legitimate
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephane Bortzmeyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
in the UK it [phone number portability] 's done with something
similar to DNS. The telephone system looks up the first N digits of
the number to determine the operator it was first issued to. And
places a query to
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
...
> I wouldn't be suprised if in a few years some EU/US law mandates IP number
> portability, just like people have with their cellphones. Imagine what
> that will do to the routing tables. How many /32s can we get into the
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
