First problem is the name Samsung. This sounds like an electronics
manufacturing
company, not an Internet Service Provider.
integration of 5 domestic centers and 30 local POP across the country.
Second problem. It sounds like you only have 5 data centers and 30 PoPs
in the
USA. This is not
BGP Update Report
Interval: 14-Jan-08 -to- 14-Feb-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS949872755 1.3% 60.7 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD.
2 - AS480256636
This report has been generated at Fri Feb 15 21:16:48 2008 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
Very nice advice. thank you, Michael. I quite agree with you.
integrationof5domesticcentersand30localPOPacrossthecountry.
the country means Korea and Samsung Networks is an ISP who is based on South
Korea.
I will revise peering request mail and
On 2008/02/15 11:34, ChiYoung Joung wrote:
Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
...
PEhUTUw+PEhFQUQ+CjxNRVRBIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9Q29udGVudC1UeXBlIGNvbnRlbnQ9J3RleHQv
aHRtbDsgY2hhcnNldD13aW5kb3dzLTEyNTInPgo8dGl0bGU+U2Ftc3VuZyBFbnRlcnByaXNlIFBv
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Chen) writes:
A typical Internet Exchange Point (IXP) consists of one or more
network
switches http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_switch, to which
each of
the participating ISPs connect. We call it the
A minor point perhaps, but most technical people I know prefer to
receive plaintext emails.
s/prefer/have/ in a lot of cases
We get a lot of spam and for technical matters don't need html which
usually gets trapped as spam, as was the posters message to the list.
brandon
The proposal was posted to PPML, but, since the AC has not yet
moved it forward to formal proposal status, it doesn't have a number
and isn't on the ARIN web site just yet.
The thread on PPML is available here:
[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
Owen
Has anyone else noticed that Cogent communities appear to no longer be
taking effect for BGP speaking customers?
Particularly 174:991, 174:3002 and no-export?
Prefixes I'm talking about (if you want to see from your routeview)
include: 208.67.222.0/24 and 208.67.220.0/24 sourced from 36692.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:20:53AM -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Rod Beck wrote:
I am suggesting a Certified Drinkers Event in the hotel bar Sunday evening.
Any Hash House Harriers in our midst?
The thought of the cross-section of society that would partake in both
NANOG and H^3 is rather
There's also some golf taking place, but it might be too late for this
NANOG. If you golf and attend NANOG drop me a line and we'll set you
up with the specifics. We're also close to being able to crertify a
PGA sanctioned club. ;)
Search Facebook for 'Internet Golf Society' and join for more
11 matches
Mail list logo
