Owen DeLong wrote:
The proposal was posted to PPML, but, since the AC has not yet
moved it forward to formal proposal status, it doesn't have a number
and isn't on the ARIN web site just yet.
The thread on PPML is available here:
[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
Owen
Thus spake Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I ranted on #nanog last night; the v6 transition will happen when it
costs more to buy / maintain a v4 infrastructure (IP trading, quadruple
NAT, support overheads, v6 tunnel brokers, etc) then it is to migrate
infrastructure to v6.
If people were
(apologies in advance for extending this thread here rather than on
ppml -- will gladly take responses off-list, or move it over if
responders would prefer to continue the discussion there)
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I
