What we did was to isolate our forwarding traffic out through a
separate set of IPs.
And then told Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL etc about the IPs. They were very
glad to tag these as such in their filters
This was over three years ago, and admittedly, our email traffic is
rather higher (by orders of mag
On Wednesday 02 April 2008, David Freedman wrote:
> We have dedicated VPNv4 route reflectors, they work well
> for us.
An inevitable end as the number of routes grows.
That said, RFC 4684 would appear to be the ultimate
solution, although vendor support is not rife at the
moment.
Cheers,
Mar
At 03:50 PM 4/3/2008, Derek J. Balling wrote:
So your theoretical maximum draw is NOT "1/2 the total"... in a nicely
populated chassis it will draw more than 1/2 the total and complain
the whole time about it.
That should probably have read in a well designed and fully populated
chassis... I
yeah,
We do hosting for about 300,000 users in our shared environment. They have
forwarders setup or aliases that send to their external addresses. This
forwards their spam as well. We purchased quite a few barracuda servers and
became their case study for outbound units. They actually do a re
Sorry to resurrect a slightly old thread, but I did want to touch on
something I noticed while catching up.
On Mar 25, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
Naturally, that's redundant, so theoretical maximum usage per rack is
half that, 23200W. Plus, the blades available today don't draw
e
As another Procurve user (also 3500's)...I'd point out that Procurve has
a lifetime warranty on their gear.
...and the stuff seems to last forever too. We still have quite a few
4000M-series 80-port switches in production, as well as newer models.
They are bulletproof... just run and run and
Tim Durack wrote:
> I guess we've had good experience with ProCurve, so have stuck with them.
> I also like the fact that it is the same code train for the 5400
> chassis and 3500 fixed-format. Less work for me when it comes to the
> test-upgrade cycle. We also make heavy use of sFlow monitoring
>
I guess we've had good experience with ProCurve, so have stuck with them.
I also like the fact that it is the same code train for the 5400
chassis and 3500 fixed-format. Less work for me when it comes to the
test-upgrade cycle. We also make heavy use of sFlow monitoring
(although I believe Foundry
> Do you rewrite/forward mail? .. we're a .edu, and allow our students to
> forward to hotmail/yahoo/whatever .. so when a phishing/malware sweep
> hits campus, about 60% is reflected back onto the Internet (sometimes
> our Anticrap gateway catches it, sometimes not). Because of the way
> addr
We have identified that messages from your IP (209.255.20.17) are being
blocked based on the recommendations of the Symantec Brightmail as
traffic/e-mail originating from your IP matched characteristics of recent
spam attacks from compromised, or 'zombie' infected, machines.
Do you rewr
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Tim Durack wrote:
The HP 3500 is a fixed format 24/48 port 10/100/1000 with 4
dual-personality SFP ports. You can slap a 10Gig expansion module in
the back. Around $3k/$6k for the 24/48 port
We only run basic L2 stuff, although the unit supports L3.
Foundry FLS624/648 is
The HP ProCurve 3500/5400 range is working nicely for us.
The 3500 is a fixed format 24/48 port 10/100/1000 with 4
dual-personality SFP ports. You can slap a 10Gig expansion module in
the back. Around $3k/$6k for the 24/48 port
We prefer the 5406 chassis, as it is more flexible. Does consume mor
I'm suggesting that MSN/Hotmail and the others are using a system or systems
that aren't properly updated, not that they are necessarily querying ORDB
directly.
There are no issues with my outbound mailserver IP that shows up in any
monitoring system or blacklist of which I'm aware.
We had no is
On 4/3/08, Fox, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the last 10 days or so, ever since ORDB re-activated itself and
> blacklisted everything, we have had deliverability problems to:
>
> MSN
> Hotmail
> Bellsouth
> AT&T (the same as Bellsouth I think)
> Yahoo
> Detroit Edison
>
> In t
We are having trouble sending to them.
MSN Said:
We have identified that messages from your IP (209.255.20.17) are being
blocked based on the recommendations of the Symantec Brightmail as
traffic/e-mail originating from your IP matched characteristics of recent
spam attacks from compromised, or
No. Thats not because of ordb. Because you see, if hotmail or these
other providers were using ORDB (they sure as hell arent) none of the
subscribers to those srevices would be getting ANY email at all.
There's some other issue with your IP. And it is an issue that
multiple providers are seein
Hey,
Are you having trouble emailing them, or them to you. I think this thread is
about emails coming from hotmail never reaching the destinations. What type of
problems are you having with these companies?
/r
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] O
In the last 10 days or so, ever since ORDB re-activated itself and blacklisted
everything, we have had deliverability problems to:
MSN
Hotmail
Bellsouth
AT&T (the same as Bellsouth I think)
Yahoo
Detroit Edison
In the case of MSN and Hotmail, they told us they were using Symantec’s
Brightmail
Hi Suresh,
We are the outsourced provider. :-)
-J
- Original Message -
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jason J. W. Williams
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thu Apr 03 03:13:47 2008
Subject: Re: Hotmail NOC Contact
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Jason J. W. Williams
<[EM
We run nortel 5530. They are not exactly "cheap" by my standards for
24 GE (10k list), but they do have 2x10G. Also they don't play nice
with rstp to cisco, and I still can't figure out how to get it to show
me stp port status. Both vendors in the tree think they're root. CLI
is tolerable, but if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt & Lou,
I have sent an updated email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] And, I will have a
co-worker who speaks Chinese call them today.
Thank you for your help,
Christina
Matt F wrote:
| Lou,
|
| I was not able to ping 219.238.192.6 from 192.* space, but w
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Jason J. W. Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a good contact number for the Hotmail NOC? We've got
> e-mails from Hotmail to some of our customers being returned the Hotmail
> sender with a 554 error message fairly regularly. Our logs aren't sh
22 matches
Mail list logo
