On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> As far as I can tell, neither Foundry Bigiron, nor Cisco 65xx support
> IPV6 (I could be wrong).
>
> While they probably aren't the most popular routers, they are very
> popular, and im sure plenty of cisco's smaller routers don't support it
> either
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> Yes, I don't think we need it 'right now'. My concern is that at this
> point many companies are still buying routers that as of today have no
> support for IPv6. Given that a BigIron/65xx is mostly hardware
> forwarding, I speculate that they wont b
r local Foundry sales ofice can offer
> you a more percise time-line on Foundry's planned support for Internet
> Protocol versions 4 and 6.
>
> Alif The Terrible wrote:
> > I am on the 6bone using a combination of 2600 and Zebras.
>
> Forge any checks to pay for t
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Rizzo Frank wrote:
> Good to hear, Jerry. Have you forged any checks in the past, or are the
> guys on usenet full of it?
If you're so new as to listen to everything you hear on Usenet, then you
deserve what you get - GIGO.
Got serious questions? Google is your friend.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, JC Dill wrote:
> On 06:23 PM 7/21/02, Jeff Workman wrote:
> >
> >http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/020721/worldcom_bankruptcy_16.html
>
> I *am* surprised. How does a company file BK on a Sunday?
>
> jc
Although most people aren't aware of it, *technically*, the Courts are a 24
Does anyone know of any repository of snapshots of the global routing
tables? I am specifically interested in tracking back to the first
announcements of individual prefixes.
Please respond off-list.
Thanks.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I know other people have posted about this, re almost getting fired.
> Many companies now are adopting "new" rules regarding employee's posting
> on listserves. The policy here is that employees must get another
> address through aol
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, gg wrote:
>
> Guess my home P.C. will no longer be an intel platform..hello mighty SPARC
I guess you didn't actually read this, did you? It makes no difference what
you use at home, if that machine can't talk to the rest of the world.
>
> Gerardo Gregory
>
>
>
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thus spake "Alif The Terrible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, gg wrote:
> > >
> > > Guess my home P.C. will no longer be an intel platform..hello mighty
> SPARC
> >
> > I
Good Morning,
I am interested in how everyone who is affected by the recent Spanish
Judicial order to block specific "terrorist affiliated" sites from access to
Spanish nationals?
Without re-starting the endless debate over how impossible this is in
fact, since that is obvious -
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am looking for a very simple piece of gear that will do the following:
>
> Fast-E |thing|---ATM OC3--|thing| Fast-E
(1) Sonoma (now rebranded & I can't remember to what)
(2) Alcatel 480
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranso
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:32:41AM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >
> > FORTRAN/COBOL array bounds checking. Bell Labs answer: C. Who wants
> > the computer to check array lengths or pointers. Programmers know what
> > they are doing, and don'
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a resource that they believe in when it
> refers to how much spam really costs Network operatos?
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/09/magazine/09SPAM.html
>
> I'm trying to do some validation. Thanks.
>
> -M
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Anybody have a pointer to scripts to map IP to AS?
Google is your friend ;-)
> There are still 10K-20K hosts spewing M$SQL slammer/sapphire packets,
> and I'd like to start blocking routing to those irresponsible AS's
> that haven't bloc
14 matches
Mail list logo
