...They seem to come & go as they please!
Inspired by RAS's prior posts regarding /16's that were hastly de-agged, I
took some time this weekend to answer a few questions which came up; how
many updates do I hear about a specific prefix, and does the length have any
relationship? Well, several h
Richard J. Sears said:
> We have changed multilink bundles, tried different types of switching
> and route caching, turning on and off fragmentation - the only thing
[snip]
> dCEF is enable on both
> routers, however the problem remains the same even after disable dCEF.
Your last line, I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> So I'm wondering what are others doing on this regard?
One of the more effective ways to deal with this would be to request that
upstream(s) null-route your aggregate until the attack subsides.
--Tk
Bill Woodcock said:
>
> > I am looking for an economical solution to compress
> > 1248 voice DS-0s to 240 DS0s. My application is to
> > extend the voice and data for a call center that needs
> > roughly 63 T-1 equivalents of bandwidth down 21
> > physical T-1 ciscuits.
[snip
Rodney Joffe said:
[snip]
> 900 mhz and 1800 mhz. And facing East or West. And Satellite,
> somewhat above 2.0 ghz.
Hmm.
> And a significant number of ISPs are currently employing 802.11 2.4
> and 5.0+ ghz equipment for last mile links (Proxim Tsunami) and
> Motorola Canopy gear.
The PSD of t
All,
I put a small talk on at this years Defcon, discussing some of the rtt
work I've been doing. For those interested in the topic, I've placed
an mp3 of the presentation and my slides here:
http://144.92.40.150/~xam/misc/dc-11/dc11-talk.htm
http://144.92.40.150/~xam/misc/dc-11/020.MP3
Enjoy,
