I thought I would chime in quickly, one of my customers has been one
of the targets of this attack. The x.p.ctrc.cc DNS server was shut
down on the 15th, the response itself had a 36 TTL so that should
be expired by now.
On this end of it, the largest traffic spike we received was ar
Apparently GoDaddy does not support v6 glue for their customers, who
does? I don't think requiring dual-stack v6 users perform v4 queries
to find records is all that great.
Any input would be helpful,
-Barrett
If you deploy dual-stack, it is much easier to keep doing the DNS
queries
using IPv4 transport, and there is not any practical advantage in
doing so
with IPv6 transport.
Thanks Jordi, not to sound too brash but, I'm already doing so. I am
trying not to deploy a hacked v6 service which r
One note here is that even though you can get glue into com/net/org
using this method, there is no IPv6 glue for the root yet, as such
even
if you manage to get the IPv6 glue in, it won't accomplish much
(except
sending all IPv6 capable resolvers over IPv6 transport :) as all
Unless I did
there are providers that have (in the US even if that matters) ipv6
connected auth servers, that could even help. I can't seem to make
one of
them want to be a registrar too :( but... maybe Ultra/Neustar could do
that for you?
Neustar/Ultra's .org gtld registration services apparently do no
Apple is nice enough to provide an automatic v6 tunnel from their new
Airport Extreme units. They even get all the machines on the network
to participate -- by default! At first this did not seem to be much
of an issue, it was even pretty cool.
However, I noticed as I roll out more v6 s
On Sep 15, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Rich Groves wrote:
Are there any reliable stats on the number of 6in4 tunnel connects
after the Extreme was released ? I'm just wondering if this is
something that we as a community can easily track.
Some DNS analysis at the provider I worked for in the past
How did you do the naming? Matching or unique?
Matched , I was thinking about doing a w6 or something more
unique for now, but that somewhat defeats the point.
The other thought that occurred to me, does FF/Safari/IE have any
ability to default back to v4 if v6 is not working o
Getting back to my original discussion with Barrett, what should we do
about naming? I initially though that segregating v6 in a subdomain
was a good idea, but if this is truly a migration, v4 should be the
interface segregated.
Personally I find separation of the A/ somewhat of a
dysfu
On Sep 18, 2007, at 1:30 PM, David Conrad wrote:
HI,
On Sep 18, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Please please please, for the sake of a semi-'standard', please
only use
the following forms in those cases:
www.
www.ipv6.
www.ipv4.
Don't come up with any other variants. The above f
Jared,
I yanked the mp3 out of the youtube flv: http://blyon.com/
routers_died.mp3
-Barrett
On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:42:27PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
Cool. Time for a remix as well
11 matches
Mail list logo
