On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:00:13AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Are you sure that this is not in Sprint, or even Duke Energy ?
>
> I can't ping to 192.234.122.137 from either home or work, and I don't
> see any signs of Cogent problems
> from Tyco Road / Tysons Corner.
It would seem that t
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:38:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cogent is experiencing two problems right now. Their automated message
> reports that they have a backbone problem causing latency, but they also
> seem to be experiencing peering problems with Sprint.
>
> 2 g1-0.core01.ord
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:07:08AM -0700, Rick Ernst wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way to globally protect all inbound interfaces on a router via ACL
> (specifically hundreds of frame/sub-interfaces) without applying the same ACL
> to each individual interface?
I believe something like this will work
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 08:14:45AM -0500, Omachonu Ogali wrote:
> > For my not-so-bright customers I simply want traceroutes to look good when
> > they run one from Level3-homed site. Obviously a ~5-7 hops to us looks
> > really disturbing, try to explain to one of them that there is no problem.
>
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 09:45:21PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> > 2. I think I asked this before, why wouldn't Cogent prepend
> > customer prefixes to Level3 or set BGP4 community for multihomed sites,
> > homed w/ Cogent + someone else.
>
> You got your answer to this before, what par
Speaking of this whole Cogent/AOL/Level3 mess.. sigh.
I got tired of trying getting anything out of Cogent. So, here's list of
questions perhaps someone might be able to answer.
1. I'm sure some of you are customers of Level3, and I'm sure
you do see 1-2 sec latency w/ Cogent, what's the officia
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:23:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Me thinks Cogent doesn't have a problem with congestion on the inbound
> > > direction. Fix your reverse path.
> >
> > Customers of Cogent should be/are more concerned about congestion on the
> > inbounds at Level3 <-> C
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:36:04PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> > Why wouldn't Cogent create a community string to provide its multihomed
> > customers with prepend 16631 (or customer asn) to Level3 peering sessions
> > to control inbounds better?
>
> Me thinks Cogent doesn't have a pro
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:12:02PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:44:55AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > AOL (AS1668) stopped peering with cogent yesterday for reasons they did
> > not disclose publicly. Cogent sends same letter to all customers who
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:52:06PM -0600, Basil Kruglov wrote:
> > policies. Please contact privately. Thanks in advance,
>
> Opps.. it's a typo, Cogent/AS16631.
Quite a few people responded. Thanks everyone,
-Basil @ CIFNet
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:30:24PM -0600, Basil Kruglov wrote:
> Sorry for the off topic and I apologize in advance.
>
> But can someone who's got IP transit and BGP session with Cogent/AS11418 get
> in touch with me? I have a few really quick questions in re to their BGP
&
Sorry for the off topic and I apologize in advance.
But can someone who's got IP transit and BGP session with Cogent/AS11418 get
in touch with me? I have a few really quick questions in re to their BGP
policies. Please contact privately. Thanks in advance,
-Basil @ CIFNet
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 04:45:43AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Wojtek Zlobicki wrote:
> >
> > Where are providers drawing the line ? Anyone have somewhat detailed
> > published policies as to what a provider can do in order to protect their
> > nework as a whole.
>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:06:58AM -0800, Livio Ricciulli wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a process for claiming a deduction in charges when
> fees are associated with a flooding attack?
> In particular, attacks may push up the 95% usage or (more commonly)
> attacks may create prolonged
> loss of
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 07:16:06PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> So, the Friday of Exodus de-peering has passed.
>
> First of all, has it happened?
well, Verio customers are getting through C&W to Exodus networks.
Yet OpenTransit customers are still peering (if it's not transit ?) with
Exodu
15 matches
Mail list logo
