John R Levine wrote:
A PGP or S/MIME signature assures you that the mail definitely came from
the address it purports to come from, but it doesn't tell you whether that
person is who you think it is. That's where limited access domains can
help.
No actually a PGP signature assures you that a parti
Peter Galbavy wrote:
I hope that the US - the largest single market for technology products I
assume - has a similar bunch of useful [consumer] law.
I don't. Who needs a bunch of laws (and accompanying bureaucrats and
lawyers) when market pressure dealt with the issue quickly and forcefully.
Brad
Steve Francis wrote:
BGP Scanner taking up close to 100% of CPU on a box periodically.
GSR doesn't seem to do it, but a buncha other cisco boxes do.
Its more irritating than anything else, especially when customers
complain
that when they traceroute they see ~200ms latency to the router...
Doe
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
I've seen this in the press repeatedly and it drives me almost as nuts as
having to call DSL access hardware a modem.
What's wrong with calling it a modem? It MOdulates and DEModulates
between a digital bitstream and an analog signal.
Bradley
Temkin, David wrote:
Does anyone know of any free, cheap, or potentially rentable latency
generators? Ideally I'd like something that just sits between two
ethernet devices to induce layer 2/3 latency in traffic, but am open to
any options...
NIST Net: http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet/
Br
Mike Leber wrote:
I'm looking for a unified table of AS names or a tool that could be used
to generate such a table.
The only public "one stop shop" for AS names that I know of is:
http://www.cidr-report.org/autnums.html
Bradley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure a lot of people have the same problem as we are having... Our
NOC and Server Equipment is located in "No Cell Phone signal" zone of
our building (It's amazing what metal walls, Server Racks and HVAC
Systems will do to Cellphone Signals). I was wondering if anyo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case, this problem should be solved by the city government in a
large city. It is a fact that large cities are large telecomm hubs. It is
a fact that large telecomm hubs need guaranteed power supplies. It is a
fact that the individual players in telecomm want to b
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Anybody have a pointer to scripts to map IP to AS?
Grab a routing table snapshot from the routeviews archive and run it through
parse_bgp_dump from CAIDA's CoralReef package. Then use CAIDA::ASFinder or
Net::Patricia to do the lookups.
Brad
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> I would be REALLY interested to know how you measure mileage with IP.
Latency triangulation.
Bradley
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In general what this means is rather than having a couple of standard
> route-map's/route-policies that get configured once and applied to
> all peers you end up with a per-peer specific configuration. It
> would seem to me that the opportunity for mis
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, John M. Brown wrote:
> What is your learned opinion of having host accounts
> (unix machines) with UID/GID of 0:0
>
> otherwords
>
>
> jmbrown_r:password:0:0:John M. Brown:/export/home/jmbrown:/bin/mysh
>
>
> The argument is that way you don't hav to give out the root
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> If the size of the global routing table is really an important issue, why
> not start filtering /24 announcements?
By all means, go ahead. You don't need anyone's permission. Report back with
your results.
> I have more of a legal right to use my
> data and this was then fed to the main processing server. However, in
> general I think it's pretty hard to make Netflow data scale...ideally you
> would be able to pick which fields you wanted exported...
The NetFlow v9 format looks like it would support this kind of thing.
Whether cisco will
> Sorry for being a bit ot:). In short whats the difference between the
Cisco
> msfc2 and msfc? I know the msfc2 is newer but what makes it better? A
url
> compairing the two would be fine also.
cisco-nsp is probably be a better place to ask, but the end of sale
announcement for the MSFC give
> Apparently there are a number of packet reflectors (usually
> running on a Unix machine) that work in theory, how do these
> work in actual practice, what kind of performance and
> reliability to they have, and which work well for traffic
> collection?
I have had good results with samplicator:
Scott Francis wrote:
> There are a great many good reasons to do so, and no good
> reasons not to. Broken software and laziness don't count.
Sure there are. Non-repudiation is not always a good thing. Do you get every
physical document you write notarized? If you are sued and email is
submitted
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bradley Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Scott Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Buffett bailout of WorldCom raises questions o
> http://www.usatoday.com/money/columns/maney.htm
Where does it talk about a "Buffett bailout out WorldCom"? Buffett invested
$100 million in Level 3 (the rest of the $500 million came from others).
Hardly a bailout, and nothing to do with WorldCom. What am I missing?
"Questions of influence"?
> Indulge me in an analogy: Let's say I own a bakery. Some punk throws a
> rock through my window. Well, now I have to either pay someone to fix
> Larry Diffey - Armchair Economist
With apologies to Bastiat and Hazlitt?
:)
Bradley
> I've been told getting the MRT sources to build is rather difficult. I
> may give it a shot anyway...
Yeah I haven't been able to build directly from the MRT source recently. On
FreeBSD building from the ports tree works fine. On Linux SuSE has an RPM at
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/7.3/s
> I'm trying to collect statistics on how many routes match certain
> patterns. So far I've been using zebra, set term len 0, and then sh ip
> bgp regexp, and wait for the total prefixes count at the end of the list.
> I figure there must be a better way than this, but so far haven't found
> one
> A NAT'd cell phone
> wont, cant ever, respond to an unsolicited connection request.
A NAT is not a firewall.
A firewall is not a NAT.
Some vendors bundle firewall functionality with NAT functionality, just as
some vendors bundle SNA with IP.
Please stop perpetuating the myth that a NAT is a
23 matches
Mail list logo
