> ... feed "tcp throughput equation" into your favorite search
> engine for a lot more references.
There has been a lot of work in some OS stacks
(Vista and recent linux kernels) to enable TCP
auto-tuning (of one form or another), which is
attempting to hide some of the worst of the TCP
uglyn
> FPGAs can be used to do both SRAM and TCAMs. All that is needed
> is an FPGA board with 10G or a 10G card with an FPGA on it.
The Xilinx Virtex family can already do 10G, if you
are into FPGA development (I seem to recall the
first Xilinx FPGA that could do 10G was 4-5 years
ago; forever in Mo
> My guess is the market will work this out. As soon as it's implemented,
> you'll see AT&T commercials in that town slamming cable and saying how DSL
> is "really unlimited".
If I were the DSL companies, I would consider advertising
with a commercial recalling the fable of the tortoise and
t
> To put it another way, they do not give you a better price
> per minute if you go and deposit $2400 in your prepaid account.
Actually, AT&T did (when I last looked at at least one
of their prepaid plans a year or so ago for a friend).
Deposit $100, get a $20 "bonus". Or something like that.
> Ah. Sorry, guess that would be important. Win XP
If you are willing to do some (dot net) scripting,
look at the information at:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms700657.aspx
"Receiving notifications when things change"
Gary
> ... Why not suck up and go with the
> economic solution? Seems like the easy thing is for the ISPs to come
> clean and admit their "unlimited" service is not and put in upload
> caps and charge for overages.
Who will be the first? If there *is* competition in the
marketplace, the cable company
> Subject: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center
>
> www.sun.com/blackbox
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?
SLAC has a blackbox (which is actually white)
installed, and running it packed with servers
for batch computing for the high energy physics program.
htt
> Kerberos does not assume clock synchronization.
> Kerberos requires reasonable clock synchronization.
To be more precise, Kerberos requires those systems
for which it is providing (authentication) services
to agree, within a configured (usually) 5-10 minutes.
There is no requirement that those
> Last I heard, the IEEE won't go along, and they're the ones who
> standardize 802.3.
>
> A few years ago, the IETF was considering various jumbogram options.
> As best I recall, that was the official response from the relevant
> IEEE folks: "no". They're concerned with backward compatibility.
>
> now that you know the whole story, perhaps you'll reevaluate
> your position.
>
While I have a number of opinions on the subject (who on
this list does not have opinions?), I suggest that the
program committee members take this on as "todo" to formulate
some sort of acceptable practice for
To make this operational, will this speed up BGP convergence?
(note that there is a difference between group velocity
and phase velocity. The posters of "300,000 Kilometers Per
Second. It's Not Just a Good Idea, It's the Law!" are still
valid).
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
The *best* exploit is the one alluded to in the presentation.
Overwrite the nvram/firmware to prevent booting (or, perhaps,
adjust the voltages to damaging levels and do a "smoke test").
If you could do it to all GSR linecards, think of the RMA
costs to Cisco (not to mention the fact that Cisco co
Would this not be a great way to infect thousands of
network operations systems due to a PDF exploit? It
is like "free beer" to many network operators, they
just *have* to consume it. One could take control
of the "network" by taking control of the systems
of the people operating it and silently
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of James Baldwin
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Exploit Cover Up
>
>
>
> Lynn developed this information based on publ
The video *might* be available on the Washington Post later today.
>From http://netsec.blogspot.com/
"Michael Lynn's "The Holy Grail: Cisco Shellcode and Remote Execution"
presentation blew the doors off of Caesar's Palace Today with a full
shell code exec capabilities for nearly ANY Cis
Microsoft has said Windows XP SP2 will have the firewall
turned on by default, and that they have "considered"
reissuing the installation CD's such that a new installation
will have the firewall enabled to deal with just this
problem. I do not know the current state of the
consideration, but to
Depending on the service being provided, Microsoft
has their own clustering solution which will
perform failover. Sometimes choosing full vendor
supported technologies is the easiest path.
With Windows 2003 Server they even support
geographically disperses failover. Info at:
http://www.microsoft
According to Cisco at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030917-openssh.shtml.
this impacts CatOS, their storage router line, their HSE line,
and their WLSE lines, and is not an IOS issue. Details on the web page.
No fixed versions of software are available yet.
Gary
> -Origin
18 matches
Mail list logo