art dropping syns). Having
them enabled at other times has no impact, so there's rarely (if ever) a
reason to disable them.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
d (more or less) for the Cray Triton.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
traffic destined to
> > those locations.
>
> ...do uRPF-loose-mode and you kill FROM these locations as well...
On Cisco, but not Juniper.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
le on /56 than push for /56
> and have people settle on /64.
Again, why the hang-up on 8 bit boundaries? Why not /52 or /60? /60 is
not much bigger than /64, but /52 gives an end-site 16 times as many
subnets as /56 while giving the ISP 16 times as many blocks as /48.
--
Chris Adams &l
d to manage this? Having a subnet for
the kitchen appliances and a subnet for the home theater, both of which
can talk to the subnet for the home computer(s), but not to each other,
will be far beyond the abilities of the average home user.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
boundary to simplify
reverse lookup delegation.
So, the guidelines are on 8 bit boundaries, but then right below they
also suggest making assignments on 4 bit boundaries (and it is all "only
guidelines").
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - Hi
hy the 8 bit boundary? That makes sense for IPv4,
where reverse DNS delegation is cumbersome on non-octet boundaries, but
IPv6 reverse DNS can be delegated at the nibble boundary. Why not
assign /60, /52, etc.? A /60 would probably satisfy virtually all home
users (up to 16 subnets) for example.
--
e ILECs that were based on
incorrect assumptions (that most calls would be from the CLEC to the
ILEC); rates based on that were bound to increase as those contracts
expired.
Back when dialup was king, CLECs selling cheap PRIs to ISPs seemed like
a sure-fire way to print money.
--
Chris Adams
x27;ll get sliced next time.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
h T-Mobile.
T-Mobile dropped their TAP access several years ago. The only way to
send messages to T-Mobile phones is SMTP or SMS.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, Jon Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you could read the header, the question you would have asked is, "What
> is Chris Adams doing in Korea sending virus mail to nanog?" :)
Especially as this particular Chris Adams is not well traveled and has
nk all those with auto-responders that respond to
list email for letting me know about this message to NANOG.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
less terse.
Okay, so instead of changing the DNS record, they snoop it and redirect
the IPs. What have you gained? How many IRC servers (especially those
used by the botnets) use SSL, and how many clients validate the cert?
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Adminis
Once upon a time, Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Once upon a time, Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I checked SSH
> > doesn't do UDP port forwarding?
>
> It doesn't forward UDP
Once upon a time, Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The flaw here is that DNS operates over 53(UDP), last time I checked SSH
> doesn't do UDP port forwarding?
It doesn't forward UDP ports, but you can set up a full IP tunnel with
it now.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAI
-cl4.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.30) 29.708 ms 29.593 ms 33.498
> ms
> 9 12.122.85.178 (12.122.85.178) 36.300 ms 28.558 ms 28.521 ms
Also, it looks like anyone filtering on ARIN boundaries won't even see
that. Register.com has 216.21.224.0/20 assigned, but announces 7 /24s
and 2 /22s out
think
they have a lot of their stuff on AT&T's network.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
laptop. Horribly inefficient, but that's the way Joe Sixpack does it.
> He probably doesn't have much of a choice.
My Thinkpad power brick has both AC and DC (car/airline) power cables.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet S
for that IP. They couldn't tell us why it was blocked or how
to get the block removed. When we asked to speak with a supervisor,
they told us that their supervisors didn't have phones.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I
if
they wish statically route that IP space, and any such security would be
gone. Unless it is otherwise filtered, any customer with a default
route can reach their routers.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You don't have to exchange E-mail with either Google, Comcast or any other
> Mail Service Provider if you don't want to.
Just wait until "Net Neutrality" laws require you to.
--
Chris Adams <[EM
resting than 500GHz a few degrees
above absolute zero).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
bility error
1 kg m^2 / s^3
1055.0559 kg m^2 / s^2
You have: watt hour
You want: btu
* 3.4121416
/ 0.29307107
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, chuck goolsbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * They lacked sufficient clue to grok name-based virtual hosting.
Name-based virtual hosting is not a cure-all. Think about SSL and
anonymous FTP uploads for starters.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Syst
ans you can run
Windows on the same box as Linux on the same box as *BSD, all at the
same time. Later this year, AMD's CPUs will add a similar (but
different) extension.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak
Once upon a time, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:51:09PM -0600,
> Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 17 lines which said:
> > unixshell.com claims more service (RAM, disk, monthly transfer) for less
&
ww.panix.com/corp/virtuals/
unixshell.com claims more service (RAM, disk, monthly transfer) for less
per month:
http://www.unixshell.com/
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
e
companies, it went down overnight one night. The cable company tracked
it down to the cable being shot off the pole in two places.
We didn't get any pictures though.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for any
utside DNS recursion.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
multihoming customers has a connection to someone we
already have a connection with, so there's no path between our network
and the rest.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ther AS (the customer) announcing it through
the first AS (the colo provider)? If the space is ARIN assigned PI, it
isn't going to aggregate with the colo provider's space, so the prefix
will still be a separate announcement. The only difference is the AS
path is one entry longer.
-
ter /kernel: microuptime() went backwards
(8144133.847075 -> 8144132.881330)
Tru64 and Cisco didn't log anything.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:21:58PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > For some equipment, it still works out to "forklift your network".
> > For example, our current dialup gear doesn't support IPv6 (and AF
e's no reason for us
to replace our dialup gear; the only thing that fails on it is fans (and
we can replace those easily enough with an hour's work of chassis
dis/re-assembly). Dialup isn't going to go away in the near future
either.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
System
gy?
Odd that lots of people are trying to download new IOS images and then
CCO locks them out.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
nd target large server farms.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
while introducing additional unknown
bugs). When I've got an apparently stable version for my setup, I leave
it alone.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
y of the remote cabinets (installed in the last 5-7
years or so anyway) have a gas meter next to them and a line running
into a second cabinet (generator/power supply I suppose).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don'
f you send a
request to the same IP address you will get a response from the same
server. There may be additional load balancing being done where at a
particular location that IP maps to multiple servers (we've done that
with TruCluster for example), but that has nothing to do with
anycasting.
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Most desktop OSes do not re-query for the name again.
Don't confuse apps and OSes. If I run "lynx", it does a DNS lookup for
each connect (even when it is the same hostname).
--
Chris Adams <[EM
hostname they sent out a DNS query?
That's what most Unix/Linux/*BSD boxes do unless they are running a
local caching name service of some time (BIND, nscd, etc.). I wasn't
actually aware that Windows had a DNS cache service.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Networ
Once upon a time, Jamie Norwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:36:19 -0600, Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Eric A. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Do you also block NNTP so that customers have to use your s
Once upon a time, Eric A. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Do you also block NNTP so that customers have to use your servers?
Change that to SMTP and you'll get a bunch of "yes" answers. Why is one
right and the other wrong?
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sys
"Delete" button, leading to mis-clicks.
Even if that isn't so, there are definately a significant number of
users that use the buttons interchangeably.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ris versions of Brightmail are affected.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
s getting tens of thousands of legacy ISP customers to switch
> to SMTP auth without drowning the support center in calls.
What does that have to do with SMTP rate limiting?
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ss of pot painting?
If the proper procedure was circumvented in the first place (which
appears to be the case with panix.com), then it should be circumvented
to repair the damage as fast as possible.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Se
with the "streamlined"
transfer procedure now in place, this would be a very good idea.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, Robert Kryger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Chris Adams wrote:
> >Good luck dealing with melbourneit.com; that's the place where domains
> >go to die.
>
> Can you be a little more specific?
> You imply that you have experi
o
> try to get this straightened out?
Good luck dealing with melbourneit.com; that's the place where domains
go to die.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
or spoofed). If you
_always_ take someone off-line on a single complaint, you make it easy
for someone to get someone else kicked off.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
gt; paid for.
For sites set up with a monthly bandwidth quota, that _is_ a denial of
service.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
_udp(216.73.86.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.87.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.85.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.81.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.86.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.87.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.85.10:53)
;; send_udp(216.73.81.10:53)
ad.doubleclick.net: query timed out
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTE
UERY SECTION:
;; whoareyou.ultradns.net, type = A, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
whoareyou.ultradns.net. 0S IN A 204.74.105.6
;; Total query time: 403 msec
;; FROM: ant.hiwaay.net to SERVER: 204.74.113.1
;; WHEN: Thu Jul 1 20:10:28 2004
;; MSG SIZE sent: 40 rcvd: 56
$
--
Chris Adams <
single public IP
because there are multiple computers scanning.
NAT does help if you just put necessary port mappings in place (and only
for "secure" protocols).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak
as civil
Why bother with copyright sources; I don't expect I'm giving anyone any
ideas, but how much (grammatically correct) text is in Project
Gutenberg?
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
t we switched to a different 20A strip and it is working
fine on a 20A breaker) and that while they would replace it, if the
replacement failed they would NOT replace it.
I prefer APC for small UPSes, but I'm not impressed by support on a
simple power strip.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTE
town; I
think UPS thought we were crazy.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Just
> wondering if this is local, or if others have suddenly seen the same.
I'm seeing them too (also BIND 9.2.1). They seem to come in bunches.
It looks like they started at a little after 5am (CST) today.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiW
a complaint with sending IP, we don't
have to look through the logs for the whole cluster to find the
offender.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
theoretically would
> double the GEIP's throughput?
I don't know how much more capable it is, but the GEIP+ is based on the
VIP4.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
had to move something after testing it and missed
re-testing it).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ing a static route pointing at our
AT&T link does show that they will route 10.0.0.0/8 traffic (at least a
few random IPs I tried).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
lized (the default) to unchannelized causes a cbus complex
restart, which interrupts traffic through the router for a period of
time (the time varies based on the number of interfaces in the router).
Of course, since OIR sometimes can cause a router reload anyway, maybe
that's not suc
Once upon a time, Haesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am trying from different locations and its not connecting.. traceroute
> dies after arin-gw.customer.alter.net
whois.arin.net and www.arin.net are working from here. It appears they
block traceroute.
--
Chris Adams <[
maybe ending up having to
use a non-standard screw for just that hole).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&q=Thawte+was+b
> ought+by+Verisign
Bzzt, Thawte != Geotrust.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
about
that move over to the BIND list or the USENET gateway
comp.protocols.dns.bind.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, John Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Here is one solution - replace all of your root.cache files with:
>
> (root) nameserver = C.ROOT-SERVERS.ORSC
Since the ORSC servers still refer com and net to the GTLD servers, this
will have no impact on the issue at h
sponse for
'somedomain.tld' is to query for '*.tld'; if the results match, then
'somedomain.tld' doesn't really exist.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ecords for bogusdomain.net
None of these help MTAs today.
For sendmail, you could do something with the dns map to look for NS
records for something.net when you get @blah.something.net. However, it
means one more DNS lookup for everything ending in .com or .net.
--
Chris Adams <[EM
it back to NXDOMAIN.
Blackholing the IP means that your customers will get an error that the
site is unreachable, not that it does not exist.
BTW: I got a "content filter" message bounce in response to my other
post on this topic - anyone else get that? I didn't see anything in my
me
er-idn.verisign.com
>
> It even responds on port 25 (says 550 on every RCPT TO). Gah.
Yep, and it'll be coming soon to .com. All your typo domain are belong
to Verisign.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don&#x
I didn't
turn the route cache completely off, but I did limit the size, and that
solved it for us.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, Steven M. Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Adams writes:
> >Yes. As soon as we put the policy route map in place, we had some
> >people unable to talk via SSH, SMTP, or POP3. It was random: one person
> &g
n a 7513 doing dCEF. We put the policy
route map on the FE interface linking this router to the POP core
router; this router has MC-T3 interfaces and ethernets to Ascend TNTs
and such. The intent was to stop the 92 byte ICMP echos from reaching
the Ascend TNTs, since several of them were reboot
Cisco advisory to
drop just 92 byte ICMP traffic, we had other random types of traffic
dropped as well (possibly an IOS bug, but who knows).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ip-glob
set iproute-cache-size = 50
wr
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Once upon a time, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Chris Adams wrote:
> >Basic physics. To run DC at the power levels required, the "wire" would
> >have to be over 100 feet in diameter IIRC. Look up the Edison vs. Tesla
> >power arguments for
nductor a "holy grail" research area.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
r sure, but it looks like BellSouth has
their network prepared for long term power outages (as long as the NG
supply keeps going).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
.), we "pull the handle" (shut off
utility power) once a month and make sure that everything works as it is
supposed to.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
eriodically send an "are
you there" type email to contacts (like some mailing lists do). If that
fails, mail a letter with instructions on how to update your contact
info, and if that fails, delete the invalid contact info - I'd rather
see no contact info than bogus info.
--
Chris Ad
o. This is the
> standard premise for any form of migration. Can anyone get aol to enforce
> it, please?
It is funny that AT&T is doing this - we recently had a connection to
AT&T installed and repeatedly asked for reverse DNS on the interface IPs
(so traceroute would "look nice&quo
y
How is this different than "ip verify unicast reverse-path" (modulo CEF
problems and bugs, which of course NEVER happen :-) )?
Multihomed customers are more interesting, but if all the single homed
customers had uRPF (or $VENDOR's equivalent) enabled it would cut down
on a sign
OS of some sort.
Do you have SNMP enabled? We have a couple of TNTs stop talking to the
ethernet periodically, apparently due to the SNMP bugs (and someone
probing). Software upgrades are now scheduled (of course, not an option
for the PM3 ).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems
n. Then if your customer types
"http://www.terrorist.com/"; in their web browser, it resolves to
nothing. They never get sent to an Akamai server.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
change being made?
My guess would be because of the proximity of a.root-servers.net
(198.41.0.4) and j.root-servers.net (198.41.0.10), which are in the same
/24 announced in BGP.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
attack the gTLD's were attacked as well, taking
> out .biz, .info, and .gov ... can anyone verify if anything happened?
Well, since the gTLD servers don't serve .biz, .info, or .gov (and those
three zones are served by three different sets of servers), it sounds
bogus.
--
Chris A
friendly New Edge Networks salesperson
telling us our circuit was being moved).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
!) 6.83 ms (ttl=251!)
5 0.so-5-3-0.TL2.CHI2.ALTER.NET (152.63.13.42) 22.4 ms (ttl=250!) 22.4 ms
(ttl=250!) 21.4 ms (ttl=250!)
6 0.so-5-0-0.XL2.CHI13.ALTER.NET (152.63.73.21) 25.3 ms 27.3 ms 24.4 ms
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY I
On Sunday, Sep 22, 2002, at 15:41 US/Pacific, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> I will agree that the security in WEP is almost useless, and have
> personally campaigned to change it for years. But, it is still the
> only
> Access Control widely available. So, it should be used, in addition to
>
being slightly off from mine.
Well, on the thread in question, my response took 15 minutes to get back
to me (well, 15:06 to be precise). That is by far the largest RTT for a
list that I've posted to lately (not counting lists with servers down,
etc.).
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTE
have any A
records, and since it isn't a recursive server, it just gave you the SOA
for mil.
If you ask for NS records (like "dig @a.root-servers.net mil. ns"),
you'll see a different picture.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
x27;t
know one way or the other what might have happened or not happened or
which sender is correct). Any other references to this kind of thing
happening?
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
MicroSoft Denial Of Service? I think it is more commonly
spelled O-U-T-L-O-O-K.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.33.4.12
G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.112.36.4
;; Total query time: 27 msec
;; FROM: fly.hiwaay.net to SERVER: a.root-servers.net 198.41.0.4
;; WHEN: Fri Apr 26 16:10:33 2002
;; MSG SIZE sent: 17 rcvd: 436
$
--
Chris Adams <[E
Once upon a time, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Is it really hard to believe that the Chinese government would actively fund
> cyberterrorism?
Why not? Our government does, although they don't call it that: they
call it Microsoft. :-)
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PRO
that
is not as common in the "real world" as different forms of password
based authentication.
Or is the article an over-simplification of the issue?
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
heir link to C&W and the rest of their notwork.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
