On Feb 15, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
ssh, or other schemes of enhanced security...?
How about encrypted config files loaded via tftp?
( Which is what the Motorola unit actually does ).
-Chris
--
Chris Parker
Director, Engineering
StarNet A Service of US LEC
(888)212-0099 Fax
d the user viewing the altered
form has made a concious decision to view it that way. Alternatively, if
the original image is 1600x1200 resolution, and I shrink it to fit on my
1024x768 image in an image viewer, I don't think you could argue I'm
transgressing copyright boundries ther
eement with RS to get from him, I do not have agreement with RS
that lets me get the GSR from him for $5.
I don't see how that is the same thing here. I have an agreement with
cust X to provide services in accordance with my AUP. cust X resells
that service to cust Y, etc. cust Y i
omer, you have a chain of agreements that establishes you
as a party.
In what scenario would there not be a chain of agreements to connect
you as a party?
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless
responsible?
It is sound business logic that if something is impacting your ability to
provide service *and* you are provided with the means to address the
problem, that you should utilize those means ( w/ in the extent allowed
by the law and your legal agreements ).
-Chris
--
\
hris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless!\ Director, Engineering
| @ @ |\ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\--
if you have video
and data on the same line. Wouldn't the telco's like to compete in that
market?
Of course, you could just as easily be right.
Who knows? :) Reality will probably end up somewhere in the middle.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris P
house has fiber run to it.
My 2 cents anyway.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless!\ Director, Engineering
| @ @ |\ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\--
away. The ALGX noc email bounced
back to me.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless!\ Director, Engineering
| @ @ |\ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo-
At 11:16 AM 7/9/2002 -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>In a message written on Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:06:10AM -0500, Chris
>Parker wrote:
> > >My own view is that customers don't want it, because end users
> > >don't have it. Dial up users will probably
ast.com found at:
http://www.broadcast.com/mcisp/
I see quite a few cable and dialup providers on there ( and I work for
one of 'em... )
To find out if you are viewing via unicast/multicast in Windows Media
Player, the option is View->Statistics, then in the Network section...
-Chr
ey peer, the traffic ratio will _NOT_ be 1:1, more like 10:1 or 1:10
>[depending on which way you are looking].
Whoops. I rewrote that part and forgot the 'nowhere near'.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ /
network. I also
think that being able to reach a large amount of content is a benefit to
the second network. If they peer, their traffic ratio will be
1:1 yet both networks gain significant ( imho ) benefit. Bill and keep
seems the only sensible way to me.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \
o much of trying to strong-arm the peer into having
to pay for transit by not giving them sufficient time to develop alternate
arrangements.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless!\ Director, Engineering
| @
strong will fall.
The soft and weak will overcome."
I prefer an inclusive peering policy instead of an exclusive one.
I think it makes more sense in terms of building a quality network.
But then, I don't make money selling high-bandwidth ip transit, so
perhaps this is just my view
at Exodus.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless!\ Director, Engineering
| @ @ |\ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo---
.13 ep.net soa
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_send to server 198.32.4.13: Connection timed out
Any insight or answer on how to register for IPs at an exchange ( since
the exchange operators are just as stumped ) would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
17 matches
Mail list logo
