> For that matter why don't they just name entire NANOG! I remember what a
> reaction there was on the list and 100% of those responding were purely
> negative of Verisign wildcards.
Hmm,
I remember a whole lot of really irrational and really unhelpful
replies. Granted, there were some well tho
I'd suggest working with Google if you feel you need some sort of out of
band access to them rather than asking here. I'm sure Google doesn't need
thousands of people picking weird random ways to access their clusters. :)
> Is anyone aware of a non-akamized way to access google? Considering
> we
> code problems from time to time, and the typical root server hicups.
Which hicups are those?
and this helps fix thed "biased technologists" image, how?
> Again, the close knit community responds:
[ ... ]
> Hence there seems to be at least some impact on the community and that's
> before these changes are even implemented. :-)
The only impact is to our mailboxes wrt messages from people who do not
fully grok the (non)issue.
my office experienced 802.11b weirdness (sudden bouts of 0% signal for no
apparent reason) earlier this week. i'm fully expecting more tomorrow. :)
> There is a high likelihood that things like 802.11, licensed and
> unlicensed microwave links, and certainly satellite links will sustain
> interfe