Time to filter unallocated blocks.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, John Murphy wrote:
>
> This block and the 216.119.224.0/21 are assigned to a company recently
> acquired by NuVox Communications. When our M&A Team queried them about
> these ARIN "No Match" blocks, we were told it was a 'technical issue
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> IIRC, Exodus had arrangements with at least some of their peering
> partners where in exchange for the toleration of the asymetric traffic
> flow at peering points, they would honor MEDs sent to them by said
> peering partners.
They did?
Christian
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Steve Sobol wrote:
> I wouldn't touch Qwest, based on the Enron issue, if nothing else.
I am pretty sure you can make a case that other Tier1s did the same thing.
This isnt unique to Qwest or Enron.
Christian
-
i am me, i dont write/speak for them
nor that AboveNet would listen to the space from other providers.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jeff Aitken wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:45:59PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> > Once upon a time, AboveNet did not permit anyone to announce their IP
> > space under any condition. I wonder
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 06:42:58PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> > >
> > > I've noticed a large chunk of my customer traffic coming from
> > > Microsoft. Anyone know if they peer anywhere on
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:32:02PM +0200, fingers wrote:
>
> > i still find some of the stuff extremely user-unfriendly (winxp) for
> > manual native configuation, and i'm sure other users do too. also, the
> > amount of support for it is still s
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
> earlier. Maybe they might have turned up something more on Microsoft
> and been able to really slap them down, as opposed to just applying
> some perfume to their wrists.
Yea, dont you hate it when companies understate their earnings.
Christian
-
From the page:
http://messenger.microsoft.com/support/status.asp
The service is temporarily unavailable. More information will be posted
here as it becomes available.
Looks like it was updated.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
>
> Actually it has been doing that for a while, even
In Salt Lake City, they have a 'free fare zone'. You can ride TRAX or the
bus at no cost downtown.
http://www.utabus.com/schedules/trax_map.htm
One more thing to note, most hotels in SLC have a free shuttle to and from
the airport.
Christian
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
>
> F
This article talks about power and costs:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06164/697875-96.stm
Interesting the power today is being used for cold storage and Aluminum plants
because it is so cheap.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
20 - 30 years ago, Air Conditioning in a house was more of a luxury. For
us, it was a Swamp Cooler. Most new houses today are built with AC and
it is becoming standard practice to install them on older houses. So the
load on the system will only get worse if things start to heat up.
Back when Exo
Eliot Gillum gave a talk at Nanog you might want to review:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/gillum.html
Thanks,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward F.
Klimowicz
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:07 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subje
While I don't work in Hotmail, I usually suggest people start here:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/gillum.html
Regards,
Christian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond L. Corbin
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:52 PM
To: Drew Weaver; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE:
I am seeing what I can find out about this block.
Thanks,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Pooser
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:59 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Abusive traffic from Microsoft China?
> Looks fi
14 matches
Mail list logo
