Re: [Fwd: Important ICANN Notice Regarding Your Domain Name(s)]

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 (16:41 -0700), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:41:21 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Important ICANN Notice Regarding Your Domain Name(s)] I receive these sorts-of notices from our OpenSRS-based

Re: OT: Cisco.com password reset.

Today at 16:07 (+0200), Elmar K. Bins wrote: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:07:55 +0200 From: Elmar K. Bins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: OT: Cisco.com password reset. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Stursa) wrote: When I tried to access my CCO account this morning I got a

Re: Supercomm: Securing service provider networks is a matter of national security

Today at 19:12 (-), Christopher L. Morrow wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote: [snip] Top executives of major telecom equipment makers say beefing up security and reliability on service provider networks is necessary to protect customers and is a matter of national

Re: working sltnet.lk contact

Today at 08:57 (+0200), Tycho Eggen wrote: Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:57:45 +0200 From: Tycho Eggen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: working sltnet.lk contact Hi! I'm looking for a working sltnet.lk contact. Let me guess the weeks and weeks of Netsky messages have

Re: orkut dns?

Today at 18:29 (+0200), Randy Bush wrote: Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:29:27 +0200 From: Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: orkut dns? i smell a hijack. the correct data are on google's servers. Ah Hah... I'll bet friendster's behind it then. ;-) -

AS3215 in the house?

If anyone from AS3215 (France Telecom Transpac) lurks here, I'd appreciate it if they'd contact me off list. Thanks, - Christopher AS25 -- UCB ==

Cogeco Cable listening?

Howdy, If someone from Cogeco.net (AS7992) is onboard, please contact me off-list. Thanks, - Christopher ==

ping GUS.NET

Hello, Is GUS Network America (GUS.NET) represented here, or does anyone have a live contact? Neither the ARIN nor whois POC have been repsonsive. Off-list replies will be appreciated. Thanks, - Christopher ==

Re: new nasty email virus trick to bypass scanners

Today at 15:08 (-0500), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:08:04 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Henry Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: new nasty email virus trick to bypass scanners On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:52:10 PST, Henry Linneweh [EMAIL

Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email)

Today at 10:40 (-0500), Richard Irving wrote: Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:40:25 -0500 From: Richard Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hijacked email Please people, of all the great feedback these joe jobbed addresses are receiving, from the anti-virus

Re: Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email)

Today at 18:38 (+0100), Dan Houghton wrote: Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:38:43 +0100 From: Dan Houghton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christopher Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hey netscalibur! (was: Re: Hijacked email) [. . .] IP in question is in use by a Netscalibur

RE: The impending DDoS storm

Today at 11:24 (-0400), Josh Fleishman wrote: Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:24:53 -0400 From: Josh Fleishman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: The impending DDoS storm Has anyone determined a method for triggering the DOS attack manually? We've attempted this by changing an

Earthlink and/or o1.com in the house?

Hello folks, If Earthlink or o1.com are represented here, could you please contact me offlist? Thanks, - Christopher ==