I would appreciate pointers to good RFC 1918 rants.
Thanks.
-
James R. Cutler, EDS
800 Tower Drive, Troy, MI 48098
1 248 265 7514
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Muir, Ronald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003-06-04, Wednesday 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
A famous Internet personality is alleged to have said, approximately,
Be liberal in what you accept. Be exact in what you emit.
'Seems like this continues to be sound advice.
:-) JimC
RE: If the roots and gTLDs are truly unwilling to help...
The cost of installing entirely new root hints files on every
Internet-attached name server around the world is ridiculously large. It
has nothing to do with willing.
Perhaps, if the problem were defined in proper terms, and a solution
Well-managed...profitably. leaves out a lot of companies.
Also
is there a forthcoming section on criterium for demonstrating
reformation by the sp and/or 'offending' user?
The criterion is stated: no more complaints
Implies that a simple j'accuse is enough to create a denial of
Pete,
passionSince I do NOT believe in Security through Obscurity as
effective/passion, I name every address and publish both A and PTR views
of this relationship. This applies to all network-addressable entities.
CNAME records may be added to taste.
Naming should facilitate maintenance of
Jim,
Yes, SMTP settings will to have to be changed to match whatever service,
different from Earthlink.net, that you happen to use. As an outlook user, I
simply created multiple profiles which referred to the same local mail
store. This technique even works with the VPN to the corporate
