I would *love* to be able to run uRPF on all of our edge devices, but we
use Cisco ME3400s, 3550s, 3560s and they don't support it. :-(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:55:05 CST, Justin Shore said:
I'm assuming everyone uses uRPF at all their edges already so that
We're connected to Teleglobe(6453), Telus(852), TeliaSonera(1299),
MCI(701), and L3(3356)
We don't play any economic games with our traffic - our routing policy
is (theoretically) designed to give the best possible product to our
customers, and although we weren't dead in the water during
We're going crazy up here, I'm trying to nail down where exactly the
problem is - We don't use Cogent anywhere, but we're having terrible
problems with Bell and many sites in Europe...
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Does anyone have any details about the Cogent outage that started this
morning
I see Cogent has updated their page - so we think this cut is fixed now?
Eric Spaeth wrote:
This appears to be affecting Telia as well. Here was their last update:
Concerning the cable break near Cleveland we have been informed that
the cables have been intentionally sabotaged. The
I bet it was set by the codfather.
:-)
Sean Donelan wrote:
Its been a while since the last big telephone central office fire.
100,000+ lines are out of service in St. John's Newfoundland (Canada,
the other part of North America).
My PW to CCO did not work this morning either. I am on hold with the
TAC right now
Joe Blanchard wrote:
FYI
I got an email that my CCO account's password was reset
last night. Not sure how widespread this issue was, but
I called my account contact and verified that this is
a valid
http://www.broadhop.com/
Eric Whitehill wrote:
G'Day:
Over the last month, I have been working in vain with a company to get
their billing software working with our radius gear (Colubris). Since
this software company's support leaves something to be desired, I was
wondering if anyone had any
http://www.middleatlantic.com/
Eric A. Hall wrote:
anybody recommend any 19 rackmount tool drawers or chests? like, a
Snap-On red metal tool chest with locking drawers and such? I've looked
around but can't find anything, although I'm probably not looking in the
right places.
thanks
I don't think Microsoft _has_ engineers, let alone WAN engineers
:-)
Erik Sundberg wrote:
I am have a routing issues with microsoft could a WAN person from microsoft
please contact me off list thanks.
Thanks
Erik
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Erik Sundberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Apps
That depends on if the SVC was torn down due to a broken link, or if the
switch is just coming online, or if it was rerouted around congestion, and a
million other tuneable factors.
In our network, SVC (SPVCs) get rerouted at near sonet speeds, although that's
not very scientific.
Dan.
trom wrote:
Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forgive me, but
Isn't Sonet usually deployed in a ring? Why the heck would a fiber
this important not be?
sonet, obviously, does not *have* to be in a ring, but it often is.
unfortunately, a fair percentage o
Forgive me, but
Isn't Sonet usually deployed in a ring? Why the heck would a fiber this
important not be?
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
in the immediate area. Outage was likely off the radar because despite
the big concentration of connectivity in the
If only dCEF wasn't phuqed in so many versions of the IOS. life would
be wonderful. We had to turn dCEF off and just run plain old ip cef on
our 7513 under 12.2.19a The RSP4 CPU spikes up to 80% then back down
then UP and down... weird.
Jason Frisvold wrote:
-Original
GSRs are useless if you are doing any kind of aggregation. Their traffic
shaping abilities are embarrassing.
7500 is the classic aggregator. They do the job quite well, actually.
Based on cost right now, I would take 10 7500s over 1 7600 anyday.
For transit, though, I would use a Juniper -
We charge a flat fee per location, all traffic between locations is
free within a metro area. Anything going out to the Internet, or
outside a particular metro area is billable per their Internet transit
pricing.
Dan Lockwood wrote:
For those of you who sell MPLS VPNs, what components of
I know this is not relevant, but the humour is perfectly apropos as a
reply.
This was the best manager call the support line of the day story:
abridged for clarity
We need an OC-192.
My god, why?
We need to be able to support at least 192 simultaneous users to our
website
Uh Huh.
I am still trying to confirm what happened, but it looks like we got whacked
today.
Around 2:35 EST all our BGPpeers dropped pretty much at the same
time. Our mrtg systems have all fallen over too - so I can't confirm
a traffic spike.
Anybody else?
Dan.
Greg Valente wrote:
I just got on today.
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:18 PM -0500 Justin Shore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Joel Perez wrote:
So back to my ACL's I go!
This is one of the most likely things to
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:11:08PM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:18 PM -0500 Justin Shore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003
I wouldn't put it past Microsoft to make a patch so poorly written, it would
actually cause all patched machines to attack the mothership.
:-)
Adam Maloney wrote:
Yeah, seeing the same here - it's been flaky for us for the last 30
minutes while we've been trying it.
I wonder if it's
90% of our customers all use private address space. We only give out
real address space to customers that have servers that need to be
visible. We run NAT on several customer facing routers.
Cool stuff we can do is setup PPTP VPNs on the same router to give
people access from home to their
that goes out to the
Internet quite easily.
(apologies to vendors watching) but I really think this push intelligence
out to the edge concept is entirely vendor invented to sell more stuff.
There are more edge devices than core devices.
Dan.
Andy Dills wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dan
Or we could all take a page from the book of telecom, and run with DC systems.
No inverters involved, lots of parallel rectifiers and battery power just
sitting there.
If only the equipment manufacturers would stop gauging on price for
DC equipment/power supplies.
Dan.
Alex Rubenstein
I agree, of course it is ludicrous to think otherwise.
It has always bothered me that we rectify AC power to store it in
batteries, then
re-invert it to power AC servers only for them to rectify it again
Dan.
Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
Or we could all take a page from the book of
I don't know what policy is like in the USA, but before a fire crew even
breathes here in Toronto, they shut off the gas. Not to mention that in the
event of any political disaster, the supply of natural gas just cannot be
guaranteed.
Although it took a lot of begging, we were able to put a
We had what I would say is exactly the same problem last Thursday around 3:00am.
The traffic lights on the router were pegged solid as usual, so it appeard to be
up and running, but not really passing any useful traffic. Telnetting to it was
pretty much useless, although it did glimmer to work
I am sorry if this has come up before, but it seems that one of our name
servers is under some sort of dDos attack. It seems to be receiving
millions of queries form spoofed IPs, and it is spending all of it's
time sending back icmp unreachables.
It is running bind 4.31 under BSD 4.62STABLE
, but whoever is doing this has this name server at it's
knees.
Dan.
Eric Whitehill wrote:
Dan:
Can you updated your version of BIND and install some acls?
-Eric
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Dan Armstrong wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:20:20 -0500
From: Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
28 matches
Mail list logo
