of proper SPAN support on 29xx/35xx series switches. Read only?
I can live with it. No inter-vlan? Very bad.
Does that make my worse design decision using Cisco CPE at my small
customer/remote office sites? H
Daryl G. Jurbala
BMPC Network Operations
Tel: +1 215 825 8401
Fax: +1 508
Sorry for the OT post.
I've got a customer who is trying to move their office 30 days form now
and can't get BellSouth to commit to moving their T1 (of course). If
anyone has any info of alternate means in the area for T1-ish access
please contact me off list.
Thanks,
Daryl G. Jurbala
BMPC
I'm getting happy pages about my sites in those areas since about 21:30
EST. Looking much better.
Daryl G. Jurbala
Introspect.net Consulting
Tel: +1 215 825 8401
Fax: +1 508 526 8500
http://www.introspect.net
PGP Key and Adobe Digital Signature:
http://www.introspect.net/pgp
The reference to 70% of people in Europe having a web enabled
phone made me laugh too... although I guess it could be true
- my last 3 mobile phones have all had WAP capability, but I
don't know of anyone that actually uses this feature.
I actually use mine. But it's behind a proxy, as
Ahhh...but this all comes down to how one defines enterprise and it's
network scope. IANALBPSB (I am not a lawyer but probably shoud be)
Daryl
PGP Key: http://www.introspect.net/pgp
[...]
That's not what is in my copy of 1918.
In order to use private address space, an enterprise needs
Title: Message
I
guess that means vendor C has no excuse on the 7200 VXR series (and I believe a
few of the newer models). But I still don't see anthing fantastically IPv6
happening there.
Daryl G.
JurbalaIntrospect.net ConsultingTel: +1 215 825 8401Fax: +1 508 526
Oh...must have been caused by a massive power drain from printing out
copies of RFC1918. Now it all makes sense.
Daryl G. Jurbala
WorldNet Technology Consultants, Inc.
Sr. Network Engineer
Tel: +1.610.288.6200
FAX: +1.508.526.8500
http://www.wtci.net
-Original Message-
From
Yes, 172.16 actually IS RFC1918. Where are you getting that lookup
from? I don't seem to be seeing it.
And I don't see how router mismanagement would cause a bad name
resolution, but maybe I'm not understanding the situation fully.
Daryl G. Jurbala
WorldNet Technology Consultants, Inc.
Sr
