On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:46, John Neiberger wrote:
>
> We're getting responses from the root servers, the names just
> aren't resolving. From a windows NT machine the error is "Non-
> existent Domain".
>
> Ah, I just noticed something. The packet length for the DNS
> response is supposed t
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:08, Paul Vixie wrote:
> ...and, occasionally, your ISP's "abuse desk." If this function of your ISP
> costs less than 1 FTE per 10,000 dialups or 1,000 T1's or 100 T3's, then your
> ISP is a slacker and probably a magnet for professional spammers as well. If
Not to tr
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 15:47, Scott Gifford wrote:
>
> The problem that this deals with is the user who needs to dial in to
> AOL and send mail from their corporate account. The proposed solution
> is to tunnel mail through the corporate server, by proving your right
> to relay via SMTP AUTH or
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 13:43, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Read my sentence again, because I really won't see everybody install/use
> it.
> One can also simply see so by the problems related to the fact of
> installing security updates.
> Some 'companies' and individuals are simply too sleezy/lousy or w
